The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From ‘Class’ to ‘Social Strata': grasping the social totality in reform-era China
Abstract
Reform era China has witnessed the simultaneous production of a middle class and increasing socioeconomic inequality. The ideological counterpart of this development is a new form of cultural nationalism that stands in striking contrast to Maoist developmentalism and in striking conformity with neoliberal logics. This article explores this shift in Chinese nationalism and national ideology by looking at the rejection of the language of class and the adoption of social strata as the language of social analysis. This shift has produced a new model of citizenship which seeks to manage the newly stratified society by articulating inequality as cultural difference in a hierarchy of national belonging. At the same time this neoliberal ethos is in dialogue with calls for social responsibility by left-liberal intellectuals in the wake of a rising number of popular protests and a growing concern about social inequality. This essay will discuss aspects of middle-class formation in China's economic reforms, first, by exploring its textual production as a category for social scientific analysis and social critique. Then it will explore how middle-classness becomes represented in mass media forms such as advertising as a new form of identity that is staged in anticipation of its realisation as a widespread social phenomenon.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this and similar policy documents, being middle class is presented as an aspiration rather than an economic category within the social structure (Anagnost 2008, Tomba 2011, Goodman 2014).”
From Patriarchal capitalism with Chinese characteristics: gendered discourse of 'Double Eleven' shopping festival (2017) · cites this paper as Anagnost 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is made-in-China feminism(s)? Gender discontent and class friction in post-socialist China
Wu, A. X., & Dong, Y. (2019) · Critical Asian Studies · doi:10.1080/14672715.2019.1656538 · Cited by 236
Meng, B., & Huang, Y. (2017) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502386.2017.1328517 · Cited by 92
A Socialist Superwoman for the New Era
Wang, Y., & Mihelj, S. (2019) · Feminist Media Histories · doi:10.1525/fmh.2019.5.3.36 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Anagnost, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Anagnost, Ann
- Venue
- Third World Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 497-519
- ISSN
- 0143-6597 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-2241
- OpenAlex
- W2145871852
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 22.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Third World Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- middle class formation, social strata, class language, cultural nationalism, neoliberalism, state ideology, citizenship, social inequality, cultural differences, national belonging, popular protest, advertising, identity, economic reform, China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review