The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs
Abstract
Stated choice (SC) experiments are often used in transportation studies for estimating and forecasting behaviour of travellers, road authorities, etc. This kind of experiment relies on underlying experimental designs. Whilst orthogonal designs are mainstream for practitioners, many researchers now realize that so‐called efficient designs are able to produce more efficient data in the sense that more reliable parameter estimates can be achieved with an equal or lower sample size. This paper describes several processes for generating SC experiments and is intended to give an overview of the current state‐of‐the‐art. Different methods are described.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The screening alternatives described by the attributes and levels in Table 1 were allocated into choice sets using a multinomial logit (mnl) d-efficient design, assuming no prior information about the likely magnitude or direction of coefficients (zero priors) [29,30].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Hence, a D-efficient design will outperform an orthogonal design, and (given reliable priors), a Dp-efficient design will outperform a Dz-efficient design [21].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“It is noteworthy that when the parameter priors are different from zero, the efficient design generated produces smaller prediction errors than orthogonal designs [21,49,50].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The most widely used efficiency measure is the D-error, which may be easily estimated using various software packages, such as Ngene, and refers to the efficiency of the experimental design in extracting information from respondents [21].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Cragg, J. G., & Zarembka, P. (1975) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · doi:10.2307/134075 · Cited by 8,477
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Statistics for experimenters. An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building.
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978) · Cited by 4,021
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753930 · Cited by 3,973
Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957) · Cited by 1,729
Journal of transport economics and policy
(1969) · Transportation Research · doi:10.1016/0041-1647(69)90163-4 · Cited by 1,578
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J. C., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300305 · Cited by 1,023
(1955) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1955.tb38334.x · Cited by 891
Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building
Parameswaran, R., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150696 · Cited by 685
Scarpa, R., & Rose, J. M. (2008) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00436.x · Cited by 643
Self-citationQuick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments
Street, D. J., Burgess, L., & Louviere, J. J. (2005) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003 · Cited by 553
Ferrini, S., & Scarpa, R. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.007 · Cited by 521
Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior Beliefs
Sándor, Z., & Wedel, M. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.4.430.18904 · Cited by 493
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J. C., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152127 · Cited by 466
Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. J. (2006) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1104 · Cited by 415
Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics
Carlsson, F., & Martinsson, P. (2002) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.729 · Cited by 393
Orthogonal Arrays and Linear Graphs
(2002) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420000283.ch15 · Cited by 322
Optimal Design for Multinomial Choice Experiments
Kanninen, B. J. (2002) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.2.214.19080 · Cited by 307
Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments
Lancsar, E., Louviere, J. J., & Flynn, T. N. (2007) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007 · Cited by 298
A Comparison of Criteria to Design Efficient Choice Experiments
Kessels, R., Goos, P., & Vandebroek, M. L. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.409 · Cited by 241
Optimal Experimental Design for Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation
Kanninen, B. (1993) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146514 · Cited by 240
Profile Construction in Experimental Choice Designs for Mixed Logit Models
Sándor, Z., & Wedel, M. (2002) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.21.4.455.131 · Cited by 223
Heterogeneous Conjoint Choice Designs
Sándor, Z., & Wedel, M. (2005) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.42.2.210.62285 · Cited by 205
Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes
Burgess, L., & Street, D. J. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2004.03.021 · Cited by 177
Stated Preference Experimental Design Strategies
Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J. (2007) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/9780857245670-008 · Cited by 167
Self-citationExperimental Design For Stated-Choice Studies
Johnson, F. R., Kanninen, B. J., Bingham, M. F., & Özdemir, S. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5313-4_7 · Cited by 160
Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models
Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M., & Hensher, D. A. (2008) · Transportation Research Part B Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.05.008 · Cited by 160
Self-citationKanninen, B. J. (2010) · The Economics of non-market goods and resources · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5313-4 · Cited by 136
Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments
Street, D. J. (2003) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00399-3 · Cited by 121
Fowkes, T., & Wardman, M. R. (1988) · Journal of Transport Economics and Policy · doi:10.3828/jtep.1988.22.1.27 · Cited by 95
Laberge, S., & Sankoffa, G. (1979) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004368897_018 · Cited by 77
Valuing noise level reductions in a residential location context
Galilea, P., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2005) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.004 · Cited by 71
OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR 2kPAIRED COMPARISON EXPERIMENTS
Street, D. J., Bunch, D. S., & Moore, B. J. (2001) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1081/sta-100106068 · Cited by 65
Design of Sequential Experiments for Contingent Valuation Studies
Kanninen, B. J. (1993) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1993.1029 · Cited by 63
Orthogonal Arrays and Linear Graphs
(2002) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420000283.axa · Cited by 56
Toner, J. P., Clark, S. D., Grant-Nuller, S. M., & Fowkes, A. S. (1999) · World Transport Research: Selected Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Transport ResearchWorld Conference on Transport Research Society · Cited by 24
The Orthogonality Issue in Stated Choice Designs
Hensher, D. A., & BARNARD, P. O. (1990) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-88195-3.50019-2 · Cited by 21
Non-orthogonal stated preference design
Fowkes, T., Wardman, T., & Holden, D. (1993) · Cited by 13
EFFICIENCY PROPERTIES OF ORTHOGONAL STATED PREFERENCE DESIGNS
Watson, S. M., Toner, J. P., Fowkes, T., & Wardman, M. R. (1996) · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. Designing stated choice experiments: state‐of‐the‐art. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Travel Behaviour Research. August2006, Kyoto, Japan.
- Bliemer M. C. J., Transportation Research Part B
- Cochran W. G., 1957, Experimental Designs
- Fowkes A. S., 2000, Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, 37
- Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. Designing efficient data for stated choice: accounting for socio‐demographic and contextual effects in designing stated choice experiments. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Travel Behaviour Research. August2006, Kyoto, Japan.
- Rose J. M., 2008, Handbook of Transport Modelling, Ch 8, 151
- Watson S. M., 2000, Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, 91
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N. D., Ryan, M., Scarpa, R., et al. (2017) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/691697 · Cited by 1,566
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Donkers, B., Jonker, M. F., & Stolk, E. A. (2015) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z · Cited by 987
Best-Worst Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications
Louviere, J. J., Flynn, T. N., & Marley, A. A. J. (2015) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 434
Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice
Bliemer, M. C. J., & Rose, J. M. (2010) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.09.003 · Cited by 258
Self-citationHow might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners?
Axsen, J., Goldberg, S., & Bailey, J. (2016) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.015 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Rose, John M.
- Venue
- Transport Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 587-617
- ISSN
- 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5327
- OpenAlex
- W2093584567
- Cited by
- 797
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 32.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transport Reviews (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- stated choice experiment, orthogonal experimental design, estimator efficiency, sample size reduction, travel behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
