From Macro to Micro—How Much Micro is too Much?
Abstract
This paper discusses the usefulness of the trend towards microsimulation in urban transport and land‐use modelling for the planning practice. It starts with a history of urban transport and land‐use models and observes a trend towards increasing conceptual, spatial and temporal resolution stimulated by improved data availability, higher computer speed and better theories about mobility and location of individual behaviour. While recognizing these advances, the paper calls attention to the problems of disaggregate models in terms of data requirements, computing time and stochastic variation and shows that in the light of new challenges cities are facing environmental problems, such as energy scarcity and climate change, not further refinement but more focus on basic needs and constraints is needed to make the models useful for the planning practice. As a possible solution to the macro–micro debate, it calls for a theory of multi‐level models according to which for each planning task there is an appropriate level of conceptual, spatial and temporal resolution. The paper closes with an example of a multi‐level land use, transport and environment model ranging from the European to the grid cell level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Whenever a small number of agents or rare events are studied, agent-based models need to be run many times and the average across many model runs needs to be calculated.
“Whenever a small number of agents or rare events are studied, agent-based models need to be run many times and the average across many model runs needs to be calculated (Wegener, 2011).”
From Agent-Based Simulation of Long-Distance Travel: Strategies to Reduce CO2 Emissions from Passenger Aviation (2021) · cites this paper as Wegener, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pukhova, A., Moreno, A. T., Llorca, C., Huang, W.-C., & Moeckel, R. (2021) · Urban Planning · doi:10.17645/up.v6i2.4021 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Whenever a small number of agents or rare events are studied, agent‐based models need to be run many times and the average across many model runs needs to be calculated (Wegener, 2011).”
Background
- Authors
- Wegener, M.
- Affiliations
- Spiekermann and Wegener (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Wegener, Michael
- ORCID
- Wegener, Michael
- Venue
- Transport Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-177
- ISSN
- 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5327
- OpenAlex
- W2150185915
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 18.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transport Reviews (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › demographic modeling and climate adaptation
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Keywords
- microsimulation, land use modeling, model resolution, disaggregate models, data requirements, computational time, stochastic variability, multi-level model, urban planning, energy scarcity, climate change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review