The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Travel and Subjective Well-Being: A Focus on Findings, Methods and Future Research Needs
Open accessAbstract
Subjectively experienced well-being has recently attracted increased attention in transport and mobility studies. However, these studies are still in their infancy and many of the multifarious links between travel behaviour and well-being are still under-examined; most studies only focus on one aspect of this link (i.e. travel satisfaction). In this paper, we give an overview of studies concerning travel and well-being, focusing on results, methods and gaps in present research. We suggest that travel behaviour affects well-being through experiences during (destination-oriented) travel, activity participation enabled by travel, activities during (destination-oriented) travel, trips where travel is the activity and through potential travel (or motility). The majority of empirical studies to date have been based on hedonic views of well-being, where pleasure and satisfaction are seen as the ultimate goal in life. They have paid little attention to eudaimonic views of well-being, which emphasise the realisation of one's true potential, although this form of well-being can also be influenced by travel behaviour. We also argue that longer-term decisions, such as residential location choices, can affect well-being through travel. Travel options differ between different kinds of neighbourhoods, which can result in different levels of (feelings of) freedom and consequently different levels of subjective well-being. Since studies at present only show a subset of the travel behaviour–well-being interactions, we conclude the paper with an agenda for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.
Ryff, C. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069 · Cited by 14,847
On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 · Cited by 11,567
Diener, E. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · Cited by 11,023
Diener, E. (2009) · Social Indicators Research Series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_2 · Cited by 10,950
Взаимосвязь статуса занятости и пола с уровнем психологического благополучия
М.Р., Н., & С.И., Б. (2026) · Cifra LLC Journals · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.170.43 · Cited by 7,950
Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology
Kahneman, D. J., Diener, E. F., & Schwarz, N. (1999) · Cited by 7,466
Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index
Diener, E. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.34 · Cited by 7,121
Cited by
The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior
De Vos, J. (2020) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121 · Cited by 961
Self-citationMouratidis, K. (2021) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229 · Cited by 873
De Vos, J., Mokhtarian, P. L., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2016) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-015-9619-9 · Cited by 485
Self-citationHow commuting affects subjective wellbeing
Clark, B., Chatterjee, K., Martin, A., & Davis, A. (2020) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-019-09983-9 · Cited by 331
Lättman, K., Olsson, L. E., & Friman, M. (2018) · Research in Transportation Economics · doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2018.06.002 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F.
- Venue
- Transport Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-442
- ISSN
- 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5327
- OpenAlex
- W2025197563
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 36.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Travel and Subjective Well-Being: A Focus on Findings, Methods and Future Research Needs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01441647.2013.815665
- The paper
- De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2013). Travel and Subjective Well-Being: A Focus on Findings, Methods and Future Research Needs. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.815665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.