The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
R12 methods in explicitly correlated molecular electronic structure theory
Abstract
The past few years have seen a particularly rich period in the development of the explicitly correlated R12 theories of electron correlation. These theories bypass the slow convergence of conventional methods, by augmenting the traditional orbital expansions with a small number of terms that depend explicitly on the interelectronic distance r 12. Amongst the very numerous discoveries and developments that we will review here, two stand out as being of particular interest. First, the fundamental numerical approximations of the R12 methods withstand the closest scrutiny: Kutzelnigg's use of the resolution of the identity and the generalized Brillouin condition to avoid many-electronic integrals remains sound. Second, it transpires that great gains in accuracy can be made by changing the dependence on the interelectronic coordinate from linear (r 12) to some suitably chosen short-range form (e.g., exp(−αr 12)). Modern R12 (or F12) methods can deliver MP2 energies (and beyond) that are converged to chemical accuracy (1 kcal/mol) in triple- or even double-zeta basis sets. Using a range of approximations, applications to large molecules become possible. Here, the major developments in the field are reviewed, and recommendations for future directions are presented. By comparing with commonly used extrapolation techniques, it is shown that modern R12 methods can deliver high accuracy dramatically faster than by using conventional methods. R12 methods in explicitly correlated molecular electronic structure theoryAll authorsWim Klopper, Frederick R. Manby, Seiichiro Ten-No & Edward F. Valeevhttps://doi.org/10.1080/01442350600799921Published online:22 February 2007TableDisplay Table
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594
Cited by
Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Chemistry and Quantum Materials Science
Bauer, B., Bravyi, S., Motta, M., & Chan, G. K.-L. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00829 · Cited by 848
Riley, K. E., Pitoňák, M., Jurečka, P., & Hobza, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1000173 · Cited by 759
Explicitly Correlated R12/F12 Methods for Electronic Structure
Kong, L., Bischoff, F. A., & Valeev, E. F. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200204r · Cited by 509
Self-citationBenchmark Calculations of Interaction Energies in Noncovalent Complexes and Their Applications
Řezáč, J., & Hobza, P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00526 · Cited by 455
Møller–Plesset perturbation theory: from small molecule methods to methods for thousands of atoms
Cremer, D. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.58 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Klopper, W., Manby, F. R., Ten-No, S., & Valeev, E. F.
- Venue
- International Reviews in Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 427-468
- ISSN
- 0144-235X (ISSN-L)
- 1366-591X
- OpenAlex
- W1999947210
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: R12 methods in explicitly correlated molecular electronic structure theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01442350600799921
- The paper
- Klopper, W., Manby, F. R., Ten-No, S., & Valeev, E. F. (2006). R12 methods in explicitly correlated molecular electronic structure theory. International Reviews in Physical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442350600799921
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.