The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liquid–liquid phase separation in atmospherically relevant particles consisting of organic species and inorganic salts
Abstract
Laboratory studies of liquid–liquid phase separation in particles containing organic species and inorganic salts of atmospheric relevance are reviewed. The oxygen-to-carbon elemental ratio (O:C) of the organic component appears to be the most useful parameter for estimating, to a first approximation, the occurrence of liquid–liquid phase separation and the separation relative humidity (SRH) in these particles. A trend of decreasing SRH for increasing O:C was found for simple organic–inorganic mixtures (<11 species). Phase separation in particles composed of laboratory-produced secondary organic material and sulphate species and in ambient particles is generally consistent with this trend. A further constraint is that liquid–liquid phase separation was always observed for O:C < 0.5 and was never observed for O:C ≥ 0.8. For organic materials of intermediate O:C ranging from 0.5 to 0.8, phase separation in simple organic–inorganic mixtures was influenced by the organic functional groups represented. The organic-to-inorganic mass ratio (OIR) affected the occurrence of liquid–liquid phase separation in a small number of cases. A dependence on salt type was observed with 87% of the studied organics exhibiting the following trend in SRH values: (NH4)2SO4 ≥ NH4HSO4 ≥ NaCl ≥ NH4NO3, consistent with previous salting-out studies and the Hofmeister series. Liquid–liquid phase separation does not appear to be strongly influenced by the number of species making up the organic material. The morphology of phase separated particles appears to depend on composition, including O:C of the organic material, the inorganic salt and the OIR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang, Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1180353 · Cited by 4,167
Hoose, C., & Möhler, O. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012 · Cited by 1,227
Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., & Mahoney, M. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5394.1664 · Cited by 571
Cited by
The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds
Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Alexander, B., Ault, A. P., Barth, M. C., Clegg, S. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Fahey, K. M., Hennigan, C. J., Herrmann, H., et al. (2020) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020 · Cited by 785
Pöschl, U., & Shiraiwa, M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500487s · Cited by 657
Liu, T., Chan, A. W. H., & Abbatt, J. P. D. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06496 · Cited by 292
Guo, H., Liu, J., Froyd, K. D., Roberts, J. M., Veres, P. R., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Nenes, A., & Weber, R. J. (2017) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-17-5703-2017 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- You, Y., Smith, M. L., Song, M., Martin, S. T., & Bertram, A. K.
- Venue
- International Reviews in Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-77
- ISSN
- 0144-235X (ISSN-L)
- 1366-591X
- OpenAlex
- W1968696455
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liquid–liquid phase separation in atmospherically relevant particles consisting of organic species and inorganic salts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0144235x.2014.890786
- The paper
- You, Y., Smith, M. L., Song, M., Martin, S. T., & Bertram, A. K. (2014). Liquid–liquid phase separation in atmospherically relevant particles consisting of organic species and inorganic salts. International Reviews in Physical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144235x.2014.890786
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.