Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence‐Based Practice for Education?

Marsh, Reg·2005·Educational Psychology

Abstract

The field of education draws on a number of other fields of knowledge as a basis for its practice. The amount of cumulative knowledge in some of them as increased enormously in the last 50 years. This has not happened in educational psychology. Some theoretical positions have been replaced by others, but often with little evidential basis for the change. A more systematic and rigorous evidence based approach is needed to maintain the credibility of educational practice. Models such as one recently developed in health practice may provide a suitable basis for educational practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01443410500344738

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Marsh, R.
Venue
Educational Psychology
Published
2005-12
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
701-704
ISSN
  • 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5820
OpenAlex
W2048613996
Cited by
285
References
0
FWCI
87.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence‐Based Practice for Education? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01443410500344738
The paper
Marsh, R. (2005). Evidence‐Based Practice for Education? Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500344738

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.