Cited by 480Behavioral and Psychological StudiesEducation Discipline and InequalityEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

Self‐reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behaviour

Clunies‐Ross, Penny, Little, Emma, Kienhuis, Mandy·2008·Educational Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between primary school teachers’ self‐reported and actual use of classroom management strategies, and examined how the use of proactive and reactive strategies is related to teacher stress and student behaviour. The total sample consisted of 97 teachers from primary schools within Melbourne. Teachers completed four questionnaires which gathered information on demographics, disruptive student behaviour, teacher management strategies, and teacher self‐reported stress. In addition, 20 of the 97 teachers were observed in their classrooms while teaching, with teacher behaviour management strategies and student on‐task behaviour recorded. Observation and questionnaire data were then matched. The findings indicated that teacher self‐reports accurately reflect actual practice, that relatively minor forms of student misbehaviours are a common concern for teachers, and that teachers are spending a considerable amount of time on behaviour management issues. The findings also revealed that the use of predominantly reactive management strategies has a significant relationship with elevated teacher stress and decreased student on‐task behaviour. These findings have important implications for teaching practices and student learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01443410802206700

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 45 · Cited by 480

Authors
Clunies‐Ross, P., Little, E., & Kienhuis, M.
Affiliations
RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Little, Emma
Venue
Educational Psychology
Published
2008-09-11
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
693-710
ISSN
  • 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5820
OpenAlex
W2169216304
Cited by
480
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
classroom management strategies, proactive strategy, reactive strategy, teacher stress, student behavior, disruptive behavior, classroom observation, primary school teachers, on-task behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review