Self‐reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behaviour
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between primary school teachers’ self‐reported and actual use of classroom management strategies, and examined how the use of proactive and reactive strategies is related to teacher stress and student behaviour. The total sample consisted of 97 teachers from primary schools within Melbourne. Teachers completed four questionnaires which gathered information on demographics, disruptive student behaviour, teacher management strategies, and teacher self‐reported stress. In addition, 20 of the 97 teachers were observed in their classrooms while teaching, with teacher behaviour management strategies and student on‐task behaviour recorded. Observation and questionnaire data were then matched. The findings indicated that teacher self‐reports accurately reflect actual practice, that relatively minor forms of student misbehaviours are a common concern for teachers, and that teachers are spending a considerable amount of time on behaviour management issues. The findings also revealed that the use of predominantly reactive management strategies has a significant relationship with elevated teacher stress and decreased student on‐task behaviour. These findings have important implications for teaching practices and student learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High stress is associated with lower quality teacher-student interactions and poorer student behavioral functioning.
“High stress is associated with lower quality teacher -student interactions and poorer student behavioral functioning (Clunies -Ross et al., 2008; Yoon, 2002).”
From Teacher stress and supports, classroom practices and student outcomes in high poverty urban elementary schools (2024) · cites this paper as Clunies-Ross et al., 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 45 · Cited by 480
- Authors
- Clunies‐Ross, P., Little, E., & Kienhuis, M.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Little, Emma
- ORCID
- Little, Emma
- Venue
- Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-09-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 693-710
- ISSN
- 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5820
- OpenAlex
- W2169216304
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Keywords
- classroom management strategies, proactive strategy, reactive strategy, teacher stress, student behavior, disruptive behavior, classroom observation, primary school teachers, on-task behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review