Age-related differences in experienced patient-centred care among women with endometriosis
Open accessAbstract
Younger women with endometriosis report lower quality of life and seek more care. Patient-centeredness is a central part of quality of care. The aim of this study was to investigate if women younger than 35 years experience endometriosis care as less patient-centred than women 35 years and older. The ENDOCARE Questionnaire was sent to 1000 randomly selected women with verified endometriosis from 10 clinics in Sweden. Answers from 469 women were analysed using Mann–Whitney’s U-test and Spearman’s correlation. Our findings show that younger women experience care as less patient-centred regarding ‘Physical comfort,’ ‘Continuity,’ ‘Access to care,’ ‘Technical skills,’ and overall patient-centeredness score in comparison with older women. On the contrary, younger women experience more patient-centeredness in ‘Emotional support’. Positive correlations were found for age and ‘Access to care’ and ‘Technical skills’, while a negative correlation was found for age and ‘Emotional support’. Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? There is a need for improvement of quality of endometriosis care. Patient-centeredness is an important part of care improvement work. Many factors have an impact on experienced patient-centeredness in endometriosis care, whereof age is one possible determinant. Given the impact of age on QoL and care seeking behaviour, age may also have influence on the experience patient-centeredness.What do the results of this study add? Our findings show that younger women experience their endometriosis care as less patient-centred than older women.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our results highlight the need of improvement of endometriosis care, especially for younger women. The results contribute to the understanding of the experience of patient-centeredness, which may be used as a guidance to how healthcare recourses should be allocated. Further research is needed to identify other factors contributing to the experience of patient-centeredness. Future studies could also evaluate how different interventions can improve patient-centeredness.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Formerly, the attitude that period pains are not an illness was frequently voiced not only by mothers and girlfriends or colleagues but also by medical specialists (especially vis-à-vis younger patients).
“Formerly, this attitude was frequently voiced not only by mothers and girlfriends or colleagues but also by medical specialists (especially vis-à-vis younger patients) [44].”
From Endometriosis: patient–doctor communication and psychological counselling (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
The Discussion reports that younger women experienced endometriosis care as less patient-centred, and the Results report diagnostic delays. Neither section says that mothers, peers, colleagues, or medical specialists frequently voiced the view that period pain is not an illness. Searches for normalization or dismissal of period pain found no passage addressing that specific attitude. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 14
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine. 2005. Building a better delivery system: a new engineering/health care part- nership. Washington (DC): National Academies Press. [National Board of Health and Welfare]. Socialstyrelsen. 2018. Nationella riktlinjer f€ or vård vid endometrios [in Swedish] [cited 2021 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/regler-och-riktlinjer/ nationella-riktlinjer/riktlinjer-och-utvarderingar/endometrios/
- Authors
- Strömberg, C., Olovsson, M., & Grundström, H.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Linköping University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Grundström, Hanna
- Venue
- Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-10-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3356-3361
- ISSN
- 0144-3615 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6893
- OpenAlex
- W4301392906
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS-964282)
- Stiftelsen Tornspiran
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- endometriosis, patient-centered care, age differences, young women, quality of care, emotional support, health care access, continuity of care, technical skills, physical comfort, quality of life, care-seeking behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Patient Satisfaction, Patient-Centered Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review