Cited by 229Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyInnovative Human-Technology InteractionTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Design, development and evaluation of a human-computer trust scale

Gulati, Siddharth, Sousa, Sonia, Lamas, David·2019·Behaviour & Information Technology

Abstract

New technologies, data, and algorithms impact nearly every aspect of daily life. Unfortunately, many of these algorithms operate like black boxes and cannot explain their results even to their programmers, let alone to end-users. As more and more tasks get delegated to such intelligent systems and the nature of user interactions with them becomes increasingly complex, it is important to understand the amount of trust that a user is willing to place on such systems. However, attempts at quantifying trust have either been limited in their scope or not empirically thorough. To address this, we build on prior work which empirically modelled trust in user-technology interactions and describe the development and evolution of a human computer trust scale. We present results of two studies (N=118 & N=183) which were undertaken to assess the reliability and validity of the proposed scale. Our study contributes to the literature by (a) developing a multi-dimensional scale to assess user trust in HCI and (b) being the first study to use the concept of design fiction and future scenarios to study trust.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144929x.2019.1656779

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Human-Computer Trust Scale (Gulati et al., 2019), which evaluates the degree of trust users place in automation, was adapted in this study to assess trust in Generative AI for real-world problems and complex tasks, and has been validated with strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84).

    “The Human-­ Computer Trust Scale (Gulati et al., 2019) evaluates the degree of trust users place in automation, adapted in this study to assess trust in Generative AI for real-­ world problems and complex tasks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gulati, S., Sousa, S., & Lamas, D.
Affiliations
  • Tallinn University (EE)
  • School of Digital Technologies, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia
Corresponding author
Gulati, Siddharth
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Published
2019-08-31
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
1004-1015
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
OpenAlex
W2970250414
Cited by
229
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
black-box algorithms, scale reliability and validity, design fiction, future scenarios, user-technology interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review