Cited by 30Media and Digital CommunicationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Cross-Cultural comparison of TikTok uses and gratifications

Open access
Deng, Tao, Vargas-Bianchi, Lizardo, Mensa, Marta·2024·Behaviour & Information Technology

Abstract

This cross-cultural study examines the differences in TikTok use among users from the United States, Spain, and Chile. A survey, in English, European Spanish, and Latin American Spanish respectively, was administered to 556 TikTok users across the three countries. These users shared similar demographic characteristics, and multigroup measurement models were established to support cross-country measurement invariance. Our results show that Chilean TikTokers are the least engaged on the platform, but have more followers on average than their American and Spanish counterparts. Additionally, users’ motivations for and uses of TikTok are associated with their countries’ national cultural values. For instance, TikTok users in Chile and Spain, which are collectivistic societies, view the platform as a socialisation tool more than users in the individualistic United States. Lastly, Chileans, who have a high uncertainty avoidance level, tend to avoid self-expression and archiving on TikTok compared to Americans, who have a low uncertainty avoidance level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144929x.2023.2270534

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 30

Authors
Deng, T., Vargas-Bianchi, L., & Mensa, M.
Affiliations
  • DePaul University (US)
  • Universidad de Lima (PE)
  • University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
Deng, Tao
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Published
2023-10-18
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
3047-3059
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
OpenAlex
W4387739596
Cited by
30
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
TikTok, uses and gratifications theory, cross-cultural comparison, national cultural values, collectivism, individualism, uncertainty avoidance, social media engagement, follower count, self-expression, socialization, measurement invariance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review