The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review and Comparison of Nanofluid Thermal Conductivity and Heat Transfer Enhancements
Abstract
This study provides a detailed literature review and an assessment of results of the research and development work forming the current status of nanofluid technology for heat transfer applications. Nanofluid technology is a relatively new field, and as such, the supporting studies are not extensive. Specifically, experimental results were reviewed in this study regarding the enhancement of the thermal conductivity and convective heat transfer of nanofluids relative to conventional heat transfer fluids, and assessments were made as to the state-of-the-art of verified parametric trends and magnitudes. Pertinent parameters of particle volume concentration, particle material, particle size, particle shape, base fluid material, temperature, additive, and acidity were considered individually, and experimental results from multiple research groups were used together when assessing results. To this end, published research results from many studies were recast using a common parameter to facilitate comparisons of data among research groups and to identify thermal property and heat transfer trends. The current state of knowledge is presented as well as areas where the data are presently inconclusive or conflicting. Heat transfer enhancement for available nanofluids is shown to be in the 15–40% range, with a few situations resulting in orders of magnitude enhancement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bruggeman, D. A. G. (1935) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705 · Cited by 8,645
Cited by
A review on hybrid nanofluids: Recent research, development and applications
Sarkar, J., Ghosh, P., & Adil, A. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.023 · Cited by 1,295
A critical review of traditional and emerging techniques and fluids for electronics cooling
Sohel Murshed, S. M., & Nieto de Castro, C. A. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.112 · Cited by 987
Small particles, big impacts: A review of the diverse applications of nanofluids
Taylor, R., Coulombe, S., Otanicar, T., Phelan, P., Gunawan, A., Lv, W., Rosengarten, G., Prasher, R., & Tyagi, H. (2013) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4754271 · Cited by 759
Khodadadi, J. M., Fan, L., & Babaei, H. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.031 · Cited by 422
Dispersion stability of thermal nanofluids
Yu, F., Chen, Y., Liang, X., Xu, J., Lee, C., Liang, Q., Tao, P., & Deng, T. (2017) · Progress in Natural Science: Materials International · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2017.08.010 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, W., France, D. M., Routbort, J. L., & Choi, S. U. S.
- Venue
- Heat Transfer Engineering
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 432-460
- ISSN
- 0145-7632 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0537
- OpenAlex
- W2016616081
- Cited by
- 1,175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review and Comparison of Nanofluid Thermal Conductivity and Heat Transfer Enhancements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01457630701850851
- The paper
- Yu, W., France, D. M., Routbort, J. L., & Choi, S. U. S. (2008). Review and Comparison of Nanofluid Thermal Conductivity and Heat Transfer Enhancements. Heat Transfer Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/01457630701850851
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.