A Comparison of Metal-Foam Heat Exchangers to Compact Multilouver Designs for Air-Side Heat Transfer Applications
Abstract
High-porosity metal foams, with novel thermal, mechanical, electrical, and acoustic properties, are being more widely used in various industrial applications. In this paper, open-cell aluminum foam is considered as a highly compact replacement for conventional louver fins in brazed aluminum heat exchangers. A model based on the ϵ-NTU method is developed to compare the flat-tube, serpentine louver-fin heat exchanger to the flat-tube metal-foam heat exchanger. The two heat exchangers are subjected to identical thermal-hydraulic requirements, and volume, mass, and cost of the metal-foam and louver-fin designs are compared. The results show that the same performance is achieved using the metal-foam heat exchanger but a lighter and smaller heat exchanger is required. However, the cost of the metal-foam heat exchanger is currently much higher than that of the louver-fin heat exchanger, because of the high price of metal foams. If the price of metal foam falls to equal that of louver-fin stock (per unit mass), then the metal-foam heat exchanger will be less expensive, smaller, and lighter than the louver-fin heat exchanger, with identical thermal performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some correlations of thermal-hydraulic performances were reported or derived for a wet metal-foam to represent the air-side of microchannel and compact heat exchangers [134, 135].
“Some correlations of thermal-hydraulic performances were reported/derived for a wet metal-foam to represent the air-side of the microchannel and compact heat exchangers [134, 135].”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [134]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qasem, N. A. A., & Zubair, S. M. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.104 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Effect of Catalyst and Substrate on the Moisture Diffusivity of Silica-Aerogel-Coated Metal Foams
Nawaz, K., Schmidt, S. J., & Jacobi, A. M. (2014) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.02.048 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dai, Z., Nawaz, K., Park, Y., Chen, Q., & Jacobi, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Heat Transfer Engineering
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-30
- ISSN
- 0145-7632 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0537
- OpenAlex
- W1996174950
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Heat Transfer Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Cellular and Composite Structures
- Keywords
- aluminum foam, louver fins, flat tube heat exchanger, air-side heat transfer, open-cell foams, heat exchanger compactness, thermal-hydraulic performance, cost comparison, ε-NTU method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review