Cited by 20LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicySocial and Intergroup PsychologyGender and Feminist Studies

Attitudes and Communication of Homophobia in Fraternities: Separating the Impact of Social Adjustment Function from Hetero-Identity Concern

Hall, Jeffrey A., La France, Betty H.·2007·Communication Quarterly

Abstract

This manuscript examines the social adjustment attitude function that drives homophobia and homophobic communication in fraternities. The social adjustment function underlying fraternity members' negative attitudes about homosexual fraternity brothers relates to the desire to secure and maintain cohesive male-male relationships within a fraternity (i.e., brotherhood), facilitate the recruitment of new members, and improve or maintain social relationships with sorority members. Ninety-eight fraternity men from a mid-sized, urban, private university were sampled. As predicted, path analytic results indicated that the social adjustment function was directly related to attitudes toward homosexual fraternity members. Attitudes toward homosexual fraternity members and participants' negative communication regarding gays was mediated by members' hetero-identity concern. Attitudes, however, were directly related to perceptions of others' communication. The implications of these results for fraternities specifically and male-male relationships in general are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01463370600998673

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Development of gay or bisexual identity within an organization of men defining masculinity can create a difficult tightrope, with some organizations having distinctly negative attitudes toward gay or bisexual members.

    “This development of gay or bisexual identity within an organization of men trying to define their masculinity can create a difficult tightrope for all involved, with some organizations having distinctly negative attitudes toward the possibility of gay or bisexual members (Hall & La France, 2007).”
  • Men within fraternities navigate identity development in the presence of other men who are likewise navigating these elements.

    “Men within fraternities perform this navigation of the vector in the presence of other men who are likewise navigating these elements (Hall & La France, 2007).”
  • Hall and La France determined negative attitudes toward gay and bisexual men rose as concerns with creating a masculine organizational identity increased, particularly for recruiting heterosexual men or attracting positive attention from sororities.

    “Hall and La France determined negative attitudes toward gay and bisexual men rose as concerns with creating a masculine organizational identity, particularly for recruiting other, presumably heterosexual, men or attracting positive attention from sororities.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, J. A., & La France, B. H.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Jeffrey A.
Venue
Communication Quarterly
Published
2007-02-27
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
39-60
ISSN
  • 0040-8573 (ISSN-L)
  • 0146-3373
  • 1746-4102
OpenAlex
W1977298906
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communication Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
homophobia, fraternities, attitudes toward homosexuals, brotherhood, male-male relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review