Resilience of Young People in Residential Care
Abstract
Children and young people in residential care may have experienced or may experience various difficult, life-threatening events, such as neglect, abuse, or violence and maltreatment known as adversities. Despite this, some of them are able to function and even prosper and this has been attributed to the development of resilience. In this qualitative empirical study, we focus on the under-researched area of how young people in care reflect on and cope with such adversities. The exploratory research comprised of semi-structured interviews with young people in two different care settings – re-education centres and children’s homes. The results showed that the sample of 34 young people had experienced 73 adversities prior to leaving residential care and that half of them were not able to resolve some of these adversities. It was found that methods for dealing with adversity change during time spent in care and that a combination of various individual strategies, adaptation and accepting support are effective. The findings also indicate that the development of resilience may vary according to type of residential care setting specifically, whether these facilities allow the development of multiple individual strategies for dealing with adversities, or whether they provide social support. The article discusses implications for future research and practice in residential care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Residential care was used for respite for parents.
“They included, inter alia, ' respite ' for parents (Luksík, 2018)”
From Residential care as an alternative care option: A review of literature within a global context (2022) · cites this paper as Luksík, 2018
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 60 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Lukšík, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Trnava (SK)
- Corresponding author
- Lukšík, Ivan
- ORCID
- Lukšík, Ivan
- Venue
- Journal of Social Service Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-09-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 714-729
- ISSN
- 0148-8376 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7314
- OpenAlex
- W2890205376
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Service Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- resilience, child abuse, children's homes, social support, abuse and neglect, leaving care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review