Cited by 34Stress and Burnout ResearchSocial Work Education and PracticeOccupational Health and Burnout

Factorial Validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) in a Sample of Spanish Social Workers

Gómez García, Rogelio, Alonso Sangregorio, Margarita, Lucía Llamazares Sánchez, María·2019·Journal of Social Service Research

Abstract

Burnout has been considered important to understanding the well-being of social workers and the quality of the services they render. Despite the ample international usage of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, its psychometric properties have come into question and alternative models of measuring the inventory have been suggested. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties and the applicability of a Spanish version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) in an incidental sample of 947 social workers. Three alternative models of the MBI-HSS were tested for the purpose of identifying the most suitable model for measuring burnout in Spain. The confirmatory factor analysis supported the theory that the model of three correlated factors was superior to alternative models of one and two factors. The structure of three factors (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment) and 19 items showed the best adjustment and a suitable internal consistency of the dimensions of the MBI-HSS. These findings demonstrate that the MBI-HSS has validity and reliability acceptable for measuring burnout in social workers, providing valuable information to the managers of social services in order to reduce burnout among social workers. The limitations of the study and recommendations for future investigation are emphasized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01488376.2018.1480549

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gómez García, R., Alonso Sangregorio, M., & Lucía Llamazares Sánchez, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Sociology and Social Work, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain;
  • Department of Social Work, Universidad de León, Escuela Universitaria de Trabajo Social “Ntra. Sra del Camino”, León, Spain
Venue
Journal of Social Service Research
Published
2018-08-17
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
207-219
ISSN
  • 0148-8376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7314
OpenAlex
W2886879631
Cited by
34
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Service Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
burnout, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, social workers, factorial validity, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, psychometric properties, Spanish adaptation, employee well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review