The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geomicrobiology of Caves: A Review
Abstract
In this article, we provide a review of geomicrobiological interactions in caves, which are nutrient-limited environments containing a variety of redox interfaces. Interactions of cave microorganisms and mineral environments lead to the dissolution of, or precipitation on, host rock and speleothems (secondary mineral formations). Metabolic processes of sulfur-, iron-, and manganese-oxidizing bacteria can generate considerable acidity, dissolving cave walls and formations. Examples of possible microbially influenced corrosion include corrosion residues (e.g., Lechuguilla and Spider caves, New Mexico, USA), moonmilk from a number of caves (e.g., Spider Cave, New Mexico, and caves in the Italian Alps), and sulfuric acid speleogenesis and cave enlargement (e.g., Movile Cave, Romania, and Cueva de Villa Luz, Mexico). Precipitation processes in caves, as in surface environments, occur through active or passive processes. In caves, microbially induced mineralization is documented in the formation of carbonates, moonmilk, silicates, clays, iron and manganese oxides, sulfur, and saltpeter at scales ranging from the microscopic to landscape biokarst. Suggestions for future research are given to encourage a move from descriptive, qualitative studies to more experimental studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microbial carbonates: the geological record of calcified bacterial–algal mats and biofilms
Riding, R. (2000) · Sedimentology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3091.2000.00003.x · Cited by 1,562 · cited 3×
“Riding (2000) noted that microbial production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which trap sediments, is often critical to the creation of microbial carbonates.”
BackgroundOn the possibility of chemosynthetic ecosystems in subsurface habitats on Mars
Boston, P. J., Ivanov, M. V., & P. McKay, C. (1992) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90045-9 · Cited by 325 · cited 1×
“This article reviews work on microbial activities in caves that can be applied to the recognition of biomarkers for subsurface life on other planets (Boston, Ivanov, and McKay 1992; Boston 2000; Boston et al. 2001; Cunningham et al. 1995; McKay, Ivanov, and Boston 1994).”
Background
Cited by
Hydromagnesite solubility product and growth kinetics in aqueous solution from 25 to 75°C
Gautier, Q., Bénézeth, P., Mavromatis, V., & Schott, J. (2014) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2014.03.044 · Cited by 161
Dhami, N. K., Mukherjee, A., & Watkin, E. L. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00040 · Cited by 73
Moreno-Ibáñez, M. Á., Saladié, P., Morales, J. I., Cebrià, A., & Fullola, J. M. (2022) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-022-01530-5 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- E. Northup, K. H. L.
- Venue
- Geomicrobiology Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 199-222
- ISSN
- 0149-0451 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0529
- OpenAlex
- W2153175030
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geomicrobiology of Caves: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01490450152467750
- The paper
- E. Northup, K. H. L. (2001). Geomicrobiology of Caves: A Review. Geomicrobiology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450152467750
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.