Supervision as mentoring: the role of power and boundary crossing
Abstract
There is a current consensus in the literature and policy documents on postgraduate supervision that positions mentoring as the most effective supervision strategy. Authors suggest that this approach to supervision overcomes some of the problematic, hierarchical aspects embedded in supervision as a pedagogical practice. They portray supervision as an innocent and collegial pedagogy between autonomous, rational supervisors and students. However, mentoring is a powerful form of normalization and a site of governmentality. Therefore, I argue that rather than removing issues of power from the supervision relationship, describing effective supervision as mentoring only serves to mask the significant role played by power in supervision pedagogy. I have applied Devos' investigation of mentoring to postgraduate supervision to highlight the work that mentoring does as a form of academic and disciplinary self-reproduction that can have paternalistic impulses located within it. In particular, I argue that supervisors need to be conscious of the operations of power in postgraduate supervision despite their best intentions. I have also begun to explore what implications this more nuanced understanding of supervision might have for people such as me, who are charged with the responsibility of providing academic development programs on supervision.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These findings on the relationship between trust and power support Manathunga's (2007) ideas on the masking of power behind other constructs.
“These findings on the relationship between trust and power support Manathunga's (2007) ideas on the masking of power behind other constructs.”
From Generative AI: reconfiguring supervision and doctoral research (2025) · cites this paper as Manathunga's (2007)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative AI: reconfiguring supervision and doctoral research
Boyd, P., & Harding, D. (2025) · Buildings & Cities · doi:10.5334/bc.560 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Manathunga, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Manathunga, Catherine
- Venue
- Studies in Continuing Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-221
- ISSN
- 0158-037X (ISSN-L)
- 1470-126X
- OpenAlex
- W2110264070
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Continuing Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Notre Dame
- University of Queensland
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Keywords
- postgraduate supervision, mentoring, boundary crossing, governmentality, normalization, paternalism, supervisor-student relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review