The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Supervision – the most variable of variables: student perspectives
Abstract
The supervision literature often conceptualizes the supervisor as the primary person in doctoral students' progress. Yet, there is growing evidence that the supervisor is but one of many resources that students draw on. Our study takes up this idea in answering the question: What is students' experience of their supervisory relationships over time? Sixteen social science participants in two UK universities, at different points in their doctoral journeys, completed logs of a week's activities for a number of months before being interviewed. This distinct longitudinal approach provides a more nuanced understanding of students' perceptions of the supervisory relationship, specifically, varied reasons for seeking supervisory help, distinct needs related to where students were in their progress, and diverse in which they negotiated and characterized the supervisory relationship.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When it comes to “fit” of supervision, several empirical studies suggest that it is significantly related to the emotional wellbeing of doctoral students (e.g., McAlpine and McKinnon, 2013).”
From The supervisory relationship as a predictor of mental health outcomes in doctoral students in the United Kingdom (2024) · cites this paper as McAlpine and McKinnon, 2013
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1007/BF01383939 · DOI
- 10.1080/14703290903068805 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x · DOI
- 10.12930/0271-9517-30.1.34 · DOI
- Bourner T., 1991, Higher Education Review, 24, 21
- Bowen W.G., 1992, In pursuit of the PhD, 10.1515/9781400862474 · DOI
- 10.1080/0309877X.2010.484056 · DOI
- 10.3102/0013189X09353787 · DOI
- 10.1080/01411920902834191 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562510802193905 · DOI
- Elliott J., 2005, Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 10.4135/9780857020246 · DOI
- 10.1108/09684880210423582 · DOI
- Golde C.M., 2001, At cross purposes: What the experiences of today's doctoral students reveal about doctoral education
- 10.1080/07294360220124648 · DOI
- 10.1080/0158037X.2010.487482 · DOI
- McAlpine L., 2010, Becoming an academic: International perspectives, 125, 10.1007/978-0-230-36509-4_6 · DOI
- 10.1108/1759751X201100007 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562517.2011.570432 · DOI
- 10.1080/0309877X.2011.643777 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9 · DOI
- 10.1080/0260293980230303 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0167.54.2.211 · DOI
- 10.1080/00330124.2010.533547 · DOI
- Stake R.E., 2006, Multiple case study analysis
- 10.1080/03075070903243092 · DOI
- 10.1080/03098770701424983 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sverdlik, A., C. Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/4113 · Cited by 616
Self-citationMavrogalou-Foti, A. P., Kambouri, M. A., & Çili, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1437819 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M.
- Venue
- Studies in Continuing Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-280
- ISSN
- 0158-037X
- 1470-126X
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review