Our first time: two higher education tutors reflect on becoming a ‘virtual teacher’
Abstract
The rapid development of the Internet as a means of both information distribution and social communication seems to be carrying with it a growing imperative for tertiary institutions to put teacher education, like many other things, ‘online’. Often this is done in the name of offering teacher training to distant students who would otherwise not be able to undertake such study. Sometimes it is done in the name of ‘growing’ the financial base of the institution. Sometimes it is done in the name of teacher or learner convenience, or more efficient use of lecturer or student time. But increasingly it is also becoming done in the name not just of more accessible, but of qualitatively improved pedagogy—or in a higher education context should one talk of andragogy? This paper reports some action research we conducted on our own initial experiences of incorporating ‘online’ elements into our respective teacher education courses. They have been experiences which have seen us confront issues which go well beyond technical questions of how to teach in a virtual environment, to encompass more value‐laden self‐enquiries about why we should, and the relationship, if there is to be one, between virtual teaching and virtuous teaching.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The interactions that supported social presence were multiple, iterative and reciprocal and strongly relied on mutual respect, interdependence and trust to focus on the interpersonal connection between the members involved.
“The interactions that supported social presence were multiple, iterative and reciprocal (Hou 2015) and strongly relied on mutual respect, interdependence and trust to focus on the interpersonal connection between the members involved (Ham and Davey 2005).”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Ham and Davey 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019 · see citing works
Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Challenges of Pre-service Teachers in Rural Places of Teaching Practice: A Decolonial Perspectives
Omodan, B. I. (2022) · International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.21.3.8 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Alternatively, it can be highly stressful with lots of pressure, especially on firsttime teachers who are unsure of what to expect or how to handle the situations they encounter during the placement period (Ham & Davey, 2005; Sinclair, 2008).”
Background
- Authors
- Ham, V., & Davey, R.
- Corresponding author
- Ham, Vince
- ORCID
- Davey, Ronnie
- Venue
- Innovations in Education and Teaching International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-264
- ISSN
- 1470-3297 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-3300
- OpenAlex
- W2062820722
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Innovations in Education and Teaching International (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
- Keywords
- virtual teaching, online teacher training, andragogy, online learning, teacher education curriculum, reflective practice, pedagogy, distance education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review