Leadership, Thought Diversity, and the Influence of Groupthink
Open accessAbstract
Effective decision-making underpins mental health nurses’ capacity for providing person-centred, evidenced-based care. Whilst team environments have the potential to support effective decision-maki...
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
GROUPTHINK THEORY AND RESEARCH: IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION MAKING IN GERIATRIC HEALTH CARE TEAMS
Heinemann, G. D., Farrell, M. P., & Schmitt, M. H. (1994) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/0360127940200106 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review
DiPierro, K., Lee, H., Pain, K. J., Durning, S. J., & Choi, J. J. (2022) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2021.1987404 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cleary, M., Lees, D., & Sayers, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cleary, Michelle
- Venue
- Issues in Mental Health Nursing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-06-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 731-733
- ISSN
- 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-4673
- OpenAlex
- W2950369598
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- leadership, groupthink, decision-making, psychiatric nursing, person-centred care, evidence-based practice, team environment
- MeSH terms
- Decision Making, Group Processes, Humans, Leadership, New South Wales, Cultural Diversity, Consensus, Evidence-Based Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
