The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concepts in Theoretical Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactivity
Open accessAbstract
Introduction A. General The heart of many commercial catalytic processes involves chemistry on transition metal particles and surfaces. The success in designing active surface ensembles, promoters, and selective poisons is inevitably tied to our knowledge of the fundamental principles which control transition metal surface chemistry. One extreme would be the rigorous description and energetic predictions for each elementary reaction step of an entire catalytic cycle from first-principle theoretical methods. While desirable, this has to date been an unattainable goal due to the limitations in both raw computer (CPU) requirements and the accuracy of the available computational methods. Recent advances in both quantum-chemical methods and computational resources, however, are driving this goal closer to reality. Theoretical treatments of adsorbate-surface interactions have rapidly advanced to the stage where detailed understandings of the governing structural and electronic features are readily available. In many cases, reliable quantitative predictions of the structure and energetics can also be made. While an exhaustive review of all theoretical treatments of adsorbate surface interactions and catalytic reactivity would be of great value, the tremendous volume published in this area makes this a difficult goal. Instead, we highlight a set of essential theoretical concepts which govern important aspects of surface reactivity and describe how they dictate both activity and selectivity. We specifically target the catalytic chemist and reaction engineer, with the hope that these concepts will lead to a more advanced set of levers to aid and facilitate the design of new and improved catalyst formulations and optimal operating conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hammer, B., Hansen, L. B., & Nørskov, J. K. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.7413 · Cited by 8,270
Theoretical surface science and catalysis—calculations and concepts
Hammer, B., & Nørskov, J. K. (2000) · Advances in Catalysis · doi:10.1016/s0360-0564(02)45013-4 · Cited by 3,972
Atomic-Resolution in Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy of a Promoter of a Heterogeneous Catalyst
Hansen, T. W., Wagner, J. B., Hansen, P. L., Dahl, S., Topsøe, H., & Jacobsen, C. J. H. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064399 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- VAN SANTEN, R. A., & NEUROCK, M.
- Venue
- Catalysis Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 557-698
- ISSN
- 0161-4940 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5703
- OpenAlex
- W2006369016
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concepts in Theoretical Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01614949508006451
- The paper
- VAN SANTEN, R. A., & NEUROCK, M. (1995). Concepts in Theoretical Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactivity. Catalysis Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614949508006451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.