Cited by 104Educational Assessment and ImprovementStudent Assessment and FeedbackTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Learning to learn from data: Benchmarks and instructional communities

Blanc, Suzanne, Christman, Jolley Bruce, Liu, Roseann, Mitchell, Cecily, Travers, Eva, Bulkley, Katrina E.·2010·Peabody Journal of Education

Abstract

This article examines the use of interim assessments in elementary schools in the School District of Philadelphia. The article reports on the qualitative component of a multimethod study about the use of interim assessments in Philadelphia. The study used an organizational learning framework to explore how schools can best develop the capacity to utilize the potential benefits of interim assessments. The qualitative analysis draws on data from intensive fieldwork in 10 elementary schools and interviews with district staff and others who worked with the schools, as well as further in-depth case study analysis of 5 schools. This article examines how school leaders and grade groups made sense of data provided through interim assessments and how they were able to use these data to rethink instructional practice. We found substantial evidence that interim assessments have the potential to contribute to instructional coherence and instructional improvement if they are embedded in a robust feedback system. Such feedback systems were not the norm in the schools in our study, and their development requires skill, knowledge, and concerted attention on the part of school leaders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01619561003685379

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 104

Authors
Blanc, S., Christman, J. B., Liu, R., Mitchell, C., Travers, E., & Bulkley, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Research for Action (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
Venue
Peabody Journal of Education
Published
2010-04-26
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
205-225
ISSN
  • 0161-956X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7930
OpenAlex
W2072482614
Cited by
104
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
22.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Peabody Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
interim assessment, elementary school, School District of Philadelphia, organizational learning, instructional coherence, teaching improvement, feedback systems, school leadership, data use in education, instructional practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review