Learning to learn from data: Benchmarks and instructional communities
Abstract
This article examines the use of interim assessments in elementary schools in the School District of Philadelphia. The article reports on the qualitative component of a multimethod study about the use of interim assessments in Philadelphia. The study used an organizational learning framework to explore how schools can best develop the capacity to utilize the potential benefits of interim assessments. The qualitative analysis draws on data from intensive fieldwork in 10 elementary schools and interviews with district staff and others who worked with the schools, as well as further in-depth case study analysis of 5 schools. This article examines how school leaders and grade groups made sense of data provided through interim assessments and how they were able to use these data to rethink instructional practice. We found substantial evidence that interim assessments have the potential to contribute to instructional coherence and instructional improvement if they are embedded in a robust feedback system. Such feedback systems were not the norm in the schools in our study, and their development requires skill, knowledge, and concerted attention on the part of school leaders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies found that data literacy is important for DBDM.
“Many studies found that data literacy is important for DBDM”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Blanc et al., 2010
Teachers need to be able to transform data into information based on their analysis and interpretation of the data, including identifying student learning needs and determining appropriate actions.
“Further, teachers need to be able to transform data into information based on their analysis and interpretation of the data.This step concerns identifying student learning needs”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Blanc et al., 2010
Fifteen studies concluded that teachers need pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) to be able to implement DBDM or AfL.
“Fifteen studies concluded that teachers need pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) to be able to implement DBDM or AfL”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Blanc et al., 2010
Many studies pointed to the importance of collaboration between teachers in regard to DBDM, and some also found this for AfL.
“Many studies pointed to the importance of collaboration between teachers in regard to DBDM”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Blanc et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Blanc, S., Christman, J. B., Liu, R., Mitchell, C., Travers, E., & Bulkley, K. E.
- Affiliations
- Research for Action (US)
- Montclair State University (US)
- ORCID
- Bulkley, Katrina E.
- Venue
- Peabody Journal of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-04-26
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-225
- ISSN
- 0161-956X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7930
- OpenAlex
- W2072482614
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 22.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Peabody Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- interim assessment, elementary school, School District of Philadelphia, organizational learning, instructional coherence, teaching improvement, feedback systems, school leadership, data use in education, instructional practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review