Cited by 19Diverse Educational Innovations StudiesEducation Systems and PolicyVocational and Entrepreneurial Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Achievement Outcomes Among High School Graduates in College and Career Readiness Programs of Study

Castellano, Marisa, Ewart Sundell, Kirsten, Richardson, George B.·2017·Peabody Journal of Education

Abstract

This study investigated the relationships between completing the high school portion of a college- and career-preparatory program of study and high school achievement outcomes in a large urban district in the West. Programs of study are secondary-to-postsecondary educational programs mandated by the federal legislation (Perkins IV) governing career and technical education (CTE) in the United States. At graduation, 49.5% of students in the sample who began a program of study had completed their programs. Using multiple regression models, we compared graduates who completed a program of study (hereafter POS completers) to graduates who completed a number of CTE courses in a specific occupational area (CTE concentrators), and to graduates who may have taken a CTE course or two during high school but were neither POS completers nor CTE concentrators (All Others). POS completers were more likely to (a) have a higher overall GPA, (b) have a higher CTE GPA, and (c) earn more STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) credits than All Other students. Compared with CTE concentrators, POS completers were more likely to (a) have a higher overall GPA and (b) earn more STEM credits. Qualitative data describe contextual elements of programs of study as offered in West District that could explain these results. Study results suggest that districts should consider implementing career-themed programs such as programs of study that enhance their existing college- and career-readiness initiatives. We also call for further study of the postsecondary and labor market outcomes associated with programs of study in order to generate a clearer picture of their potential to increase academic and technical achievement and promote successful student transitions to higher education and the workplace.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0161956x.2017.1302220

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 19

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Allen J., 2005, Using ACT assessment scores to set benchmarks for college readiness
  2. Bottoms J. E., 2015, Credentials for all: An imperative for SREB states
  3. ConnectEd, Essential elements of high quality linked learning pathways
  4. Council of Chief State School Officers, 2014, Opportunities and options: Making career preparation work for students
  5. Fernandez F, 2015, Transforming the American high school experience: NAF's four-year graduation rates from Broward County Public Schools, Florida; Miami-Dade Public Schools, Florida; and Porterville Unified School District, California
  6. Institute for a Competitive Workforce, 2008, The skills imperative: How career and technical education can solve the U.S. talent shortage
  7. National Career Academy Coalition, Career academies change lives every day
  8. National Governors Association, 2014, America works: Education and training for tomorrow's jobs
  9. North Carolina New Schools, 2013, North Carolina new schools: Support by evidence, proven by performance and backed by research
  10. Resnick L. B., 1987, Educational Researcher, 16, 13
  11. Southern Regional Education Board, 2010, Reporting on college readiness: Information that connects colleges and schools
  12. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, 2013, What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0)
  13. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education, 2010, Programs of study design framework
  14. U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and U.S. Department of Labor, 2012, Joint letter and guiding principles for developing comprehensive career pathways systems

Metadata

Authors
Castellano, M., Ewart Sundell, K., & Richardson, G. B.
Affiliations
  • Southern Regional Education Board (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Castellano, Marisa
Venue
Peabody Journal of Education
Published
2017-03-06
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
254-274
ISSN
  • 0161-956X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7930
OpenAlex
W2594888714
Cited by
19
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Peabody Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Systems and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
Keywords
college and career readiness, programs of study, vocational education, high school graduates, academic performance, grade point average, urban school districts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review