CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingNursing care and researchAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Attitudes and Culture in Family Caregiving for Older Adults

Anngela-Cole, Linda, Hilton, Jeanne M.·2009·Home Health Care Services Quarterly
DOI 10.1080/01621420903014790
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study evaluated cultural differences in attitudes toward caregiving and the stress levels of family caregivers. Participants included 98 Japanese American and 86 Caucasian American family caregivers caring for frail elders. Analyses using MANOVA and multiple regression analyses revealed that the Caucasian caregivers had more positive attitudes and provided more hours of care than the Japanese caregivers but that both groups had elevated levels of caregiver stress. The stress that family caregivers currently experience could lead to a future generation of care recipients who enter old age in worse condition than their predecessors. Professionals need to work together to develop culturally appropriate, evidence-based interventions to address this issue.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621420903014790

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Braun K. L., 1998, Social gerontology, 155
  2. Burack-Weiss A., 1995, Social Work, 40, 391
  3. Dubanoski J., 1996, Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 2, 247
  4. 10.1037/0882-7974.2.4.323 · DOI
  5. Hooyman N., 1995, Feminist perspectives on family care
  6. Markus H. R., 1991, Emotions in social psychology, 119
  7. McBride M., 1996, Ethnicity and the dementias
  8. National Institutes of Health, 1987, Established populations for epidemiological studies of the elderly
  9. Ngan R., 1992, Hong Kong Journal of Gerontology, 6, 234
  10. 10.1037/0090-5550.41.4.303 · DOI
  11. Superio E., 1993, Beliefs held by Filipinos regarding filial responsibility
  12. Yeo G., 2006, Ethnicity and the dementias
  13. Zarit S., 1994, Family caregiving: Agenda for the future, 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 37

Related

Metadata

Authors
Anngela-Cole, L., & Hilton, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Anngela-Cole, Linda
Venue
Home Health Care Services Quarterly
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-10-27
Volume
28
Issue
2-3
Pages
59-83
ISSN
  • 0162-1424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-0856
DOI
10.1080/01621420903014790
OpenAlex
W2054722346
Cited by
37
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Home Health Care Services Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
family caregiving, caregiver attitudes, caregiver stress, cultural differences, frail elderly, care hours, culturally sensitive interventions, intergenerational caregiving
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Asian, Attitude, Culture, Depression, Family, Female, Health Status, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Caregivers, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review