Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174Probability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceLegal processes and jurisprudence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tests of Significance Considered as Evidence

Berkson, Joseph·1942·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1942.10501760

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Berkson, J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Berkson, Joseph
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1942-09
Volume
37
Issue
219
Pages
325-335
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W1975468890
Cited by
174
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
Keywords
tests of significance, statistical evidence, hypothesis testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tests of Significance Considered as Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2279000
The paper
Berkson, J. (1942). Tests of Significance Considered as Evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/2279000

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.