Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,268

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Method for Obtaining and Analyzing Sensitivity Data

Dixon, W. J., Mood, A. M.·1948·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

The standard method of dealing with sensitivity of dosage-mortality data is the probit technique developed by Bliss and Fisher. This paper provides an alternative technique based on a special system for obtaining such data. It has some advantages when observations must be taken on individuals rather than groups of individuals, and it may be preferred in certain other situations. * This paper is in part an adaptation of a memorandum submitted to the Applied Mathematics Panel by the Statistical Research Group, Princeton University. The Statistical Research Group operated under a contract with the Office of Scientific Research and Development, and was directed by the Applied Mathematics Panel of the National Defense Research Committee.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1948.10483254

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,268

Metadata

Authors
Dixon, W. J., & Mood, A. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1948-03
Volume
43
Issue
241
Pages
109-126
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2050076340
Cited by
1,268
References
0
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Method for Obtaining and Analyzing Sensitivity Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1948.10483254
The paper
Dixon, W. J., & Mood, A. M. (1948). A Method for Obtaining and Analyzing Sensitivity Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1948.10483254

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.