Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Non-Additivity in Two-Way Analysis of Variance

Mandel, John·1961·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

In two-way classification analysis of variance situations there often exists a systematic type of row column interaction. A model is proposed in which the interaction is of the type Q i γ i where Q i is a parameter of the ith row, not necessarily associated with the main effect for rows, and γ j is the main effect for column j. The analysis of data according to this model is given, including estimation and tests of significance. The model is more general than that involved in Tukey's “one degree of freedom for non-additivity” and includes the latter as a special case. The relationship between the two methods is discussed. Applications of the method to different types of problems are mentioned and a numerical example is included.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1961.10482132

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Mandel, J.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1961-12
Volume
56
Issue
296
Pages
878-888
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W1982784691
Cited by
267
References
0
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-Additivity in Two-Way Analysis of Variance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482132
The paper
Mandel, J. (1961). Non-Additivity in Two-Way Analysis of Variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482132

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.