The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sequential Medical Trials
Abstract
In an extended review of Sequential Medical Trials by P. Armitage, the statistical principles which should govern the analysis of experimental observations, and the planning of experiments, are discussed. It is suggested that the operating-characteristic concepts of the Neyman-Pearson theory of tests are inappropriate to the analysis and interpretation of experimental data; the likelihood principle should be followed instead. The planning of medical trials under an ethical injunction against unnecessary continuance of inferior treatments is studied in some detail. The propriety of such trials is considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194105 · Cited by 2,490
(2013) · Cited by 1,351
Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials
Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0 · Cited by 1,185
Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001 · Cited by 740
Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2017) · European Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17405629.2016.1259614 · Cited by 267
The alpha spending function approach to interim data analyses
DeMets, D. L., & Lan, G. (1995) · Cancer Treatment and Research · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2009-2_1 · Cited by 58
Cheung, K., & Duan, N. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301579 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Anscombe, F. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1963-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 302
- Pages
- 365-383
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2009200425
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
