The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Step-Wise Clustering Procedures
Abstract
A simple step-wise procedure for the clustering of variables is described. Two alternative criteria for the merger of groups at each pass are discussed: (1) maximization of the pairwise correlation between the centroids of two groups, and (2) minimization of Wilks’ statistic to test the hypothesis of independence between two groups. For a set of sample covariance matrices the step-wise solution for each criterion is compared with the optimal two-group separation of variables found by total enumeration of the possible groupings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433
Cited by
A survey of Clustering Algorithms
Rokach, L. (2009) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09823-4_14 · Cited by 245
Devine, J. K., & Wolf, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.12369 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- King, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1967-03
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 317
- Pages
- 86-101
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2124957865
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
