The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Unbiasedness of Zellner's Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations Estimators
Abstract
The purpose of the present note is to demonstrate the unbiasedness of Zellner's seemingly unrelated regression equations estimators under fairly general conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840
Hendry, D. F. (1995) · doi:10.1093/0198283164.001.0001 · Cited by 1,148
Estimation of linear models with crossed-error structure
Fuller, W. A., & Battese, G. E. (1974) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(74)90030-x · Cited by 477
Small-Sample Bias in GMM Estimation of Covariance Structures
Altonji, J. G., & Segal, L. M. (1996) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.1996.10524661 · Cited by 369
Small-Sample Properties of ARCH Estimators and Tests
Engle, R. F., Hendry, D. F., & Trumble, D. (1985) · The Canadian Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/135114 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Kakwani, N. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1967-03
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 317
- Pages
- 141-142
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2013046871
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Unbiasedness of Zellner's Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations Estimators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482895
- The paper
- Kakwani, N. C. (1967). The Unbiasedness of Zellner's Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations Estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482895
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
