Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 584

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A New Test for Heteroskedasticity

Glejser, H.·1969·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

The quite general test for heteroskedasticity presented here regresses the absolute values of the residuals obtained by ordinary least-squares on some variable(s). Denoting the O.L.S. residuals by , one obtains, for instance, a regression like where z is a variable, a and b regression coefficients and the residuals of the new regression. We call the acceptance of a non-zero value for both a and b a case of “mixed heteroskedasticity”, which we deem frequent in practice though neglected in handbooks. The paper also summarizes another test due to S. M. Goldfeld and R. E. Quandt and examines the powers of the two by using Monte-Carlo simulations: the new test seems to compare favourably, except perhaps in the case of large samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1969.10500976

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 584

Metadata

Authors
Glejser, H.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1969-03
Volume
64
Issue
325
Pages
316-323
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W1970249195
Cited by
584
References
0
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Test for Heteroskedasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1969.10500976
The paper
Glejser, H. (1969). A New Test for Heteroskedasticity. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1969.10500976

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.