Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Concavity of the Log Likelihood

Pratt, John W.·1981·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

For a very general regression model with an ordinal dependent variable, the log likelihood is proved concave if the derivative of the underlying response function has concave logarithm. For a binary dependent variable, a weaker condition suffices, namely, that the response function and its complement each have concave logarithm. The normal, logistic, sine, and extreme-value distributions, among others, satisfy the stronger condition, the t (including Cauchy) distributions only the weaker. Some converses and generalizations are also given. The model is that which arises from an ordinary linear regression model with a continuous dependent variable that is partly unobservable, being either grouped into intervals with unknown endpoints, or censored, or, more generally, grouped in some regions, censored in others, and observed exactly elsewhere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1981.10477613

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Pratt, J. W.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1981-03
Volume
76
Issue
373
Pages
103-106
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2070243418
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concavity of the Log Likelihood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1981.10477613
The paper
Pratt, J. W. (1981). Concavity of the Log Likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1981.10477613

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.