Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tree-Structured Classification via Generalized Discriminant Analysis

Loh, Wei-Yin, Vanichsetakul, Nunta·1988·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

The problem of constructing classification rules that can be represented as decision trees is considered. Each object to be classified has an associated x vector containing possibly incomplete covariate information. Tree construction is based on the information provided in a “learning sample” of objects with known class identities. The x vectors in the learning sample may have missing values as well. Procedures are proposed for each of the components of classifier construction, such as split selection, tree-size determination, treatment of missing values, and ranking of variables. The main idea is recursive application of linear discriminant analysis, with the variables at each stage being appropriately chosen according to the data and the type of splits desired. Standard statistical techniques used as basic building blocks include analysis of variance, linear and canonical discriminant analysis, and principal component analysis. A new method of tree-structured classification is obtained by assembling the pieces. This method can accommodate prior probabilities as well as unequal misclassification costs and can yield trees with univariate, linear combination, or linear combination with polar coordinate splits. The method is compared with the CART method of Breiman, Friedman, Olshen, and Stone (1984). Some of the operational differences are that the new method (a) can have multiple splits per node, (b) is nonrandomized, (c) uses a direct stopping rule, (d) handles missing values by estimation, (e) allows both ordered and unordered variables in the same linear combination split, (f) is not invariant of monotone transformations of the individual variables, and (g) is computationally faster. Simulation experiments suggest that the two methods have comparable classification accuracy. The Boston housing data are analyzed in a classification context for illustration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478652

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Loh, W.-Y., & Vanichsetakul, N.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1988-09
Volume
83
Issue
403
Pages
715-725
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W1967610656
Cited by
320
References
1
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tree-Structured Classification via Generalized Discriminant Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478652
The paper
Loh, W.-Y., & Vanichsetakul, N. (1988). Tree-Structured Classification via Generalized Discriminant Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478652

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.