The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing for Common Trends
Abstract
Cointegrated multiple time series share at least one common trend. Two tests are developed for the number of common stochastic trends (i.e., for the order of cointegration) in a multiple time series with and without drift. Both tests involve the roots of the ordinary least squares coefficient matrix obtained by regressing the series onto its first lag. Critical values for the tests are tabulated, and their power is examined in a Monte Carlo study. Economic time series are often modeled as having a unit root in their autoregressive representation, or (equivalently) as containing a stochastic trend. But both casual observation and economic theory suggest that many series might contain the same stochastic trends so that they are cointegrated. If each of n series is integrated of order 1 but can be jointly characterized by k > n stochastic trends, then the vector representation of these series has k unit roots and n — k distinct stationary linear combinations. Our proposed tests can be viewed alternatively as tests of the number of common trends, linearly independent cointegrating vectors, or autoregressive unit roots of the vector process. Both of the proposed tests are asymptotically similar. The first test (qf ) is developed under the assumption that certain components of the process have a finite-order vector autoregressive (VAR) representation, and the nuisance parameters are handled by estimating this VAR. The second test (qc ) entails computing the eigenvalues of a corrected sample first-order autocorrelation matrix, where the correction is essentially a sum of the autocovariance matrices. Previous researchers have found that U.S. postwar interest rates, taken individually, appear to be integrated of order 1. In addition, the theory of the term structure implies that yields on similar assets of different maturities will be cointegrated. Applying these tests to postwar U.S. data on the federal funds rate and the three- and twelve-month treasury bill rates provides support for this prediction: The three interest rates appear to be cointegrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913236 · Cited by 32,007
Cited by
Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.616 · Cited by 20,385
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS
Johansen, S. (1988) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3 · Cited by 17,027
Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes
Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8 · Cited by 6,108
Manufacturing Growth and Financial Development: Evidence from OECD Countries
Neusser, K., & Kugler, M. (1998) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465398557726 · Cited by 414
Determination of cointegrating rank in fractional systems
Robinson, P. M., & Yajima, Y. (2002) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00096-3 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 404
- Pages
- 1097-1107
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1994110039
- Cited by
- 1,894
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 76.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.