The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing and Modeling Threshold Autoregressive Processes
Abstract
The threshold autoregressive model is one of the nonlinear time series models available in the literature. It was first proposed by Tong (1978) and discussed in detail by Tong and Lim (1980) and Tong (1983). The major features of this class of models are limit cycles, amplitude dependent frequencies, and jump phenomena. Much of the original motivation of the model is concerned with limit cycles of a cyclical time series, and indeed the model is capable of producing asymmetric limit cycles. The threshold autoregressive model, however, has not received much attention in application. This is due to (a) the lack of a suitable modeling procedure and (b) the inability to identify the threshold variable and estimate the threshold values. The primary goal of this article, therefore, is to suggest a simple yet widely applicable model-building procedure for threshold autoregressive models. Based on some predictive residuals, a simple statistic is proposed to test for threshold nonlinearity and specify the threshold variable. Some supplementary graphic devices are then used to identify the number and locations of the potential thresholds. Finally, these statistics are used to build a threshold model. The test statistic and its properties are derived by simple linear regression. Its performance in the finite-sample case is evaluated by simulation and real-world data analysis. The statistic performs well as compared with an alternative test available in the literature. Further applications of threshold autoregressive models are also suggested, including handling heterogeneous time series and modeling random processes with periodic variances whose periodicity is not fixed. The latter phenomenon is commonly encountered in practice, especially in econometrics and biological sciences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Cited by
Analysis of Financial Time Series
(2006) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2006.s405 · Cited by 2,348
Testing and Modeling Multivariate Threshold Models
Tsay, R. S. (1998) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1998.10473779 · Cited by 677
Self-citationNoise and determinism in synchronized sheep dynamics
Grenfell, B. T., Wilson, K., Finkenstädt, B. F., Coulson, T. N., Murray, S., Albon, S. D., Pemberton, J. M., Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Crawley, M. J. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29291 · Cited by 549
The evolution of stock market efficiency over time: A survey of the empirical literature
Lim, K.-P., & Brooks, R. (2011) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00611.x · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsay, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 405
- Pages
- 231-240
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2087677959
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing and Modeling Threshold Autoregressive Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478760
- The paper
- Tsay, R. S. (1989). Testing and Modeling Threshold Autoregressive Processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.