Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inference Based on Retrospective Ascertainment: An Analysis of the Data on Transfusion-Related AIDS

Kalbfleisch, J. D., Lawless, J. F.·1989·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

In some epidemiologic studies, identification of individuals for study is dependent on the occurrence of some event. Once an individual is identified, the time of a previous event, termed an initiating event, is determined retrospectively. This article considers problems of estimation when initiating events occur as a nonhomogeneous Poisson process, and the time s from the initiating event to the final event has pdf f(s) independent of the time of the initiating event. A simple form for the likelihood function is obtained and methods of parametric and nonparametric estimation are developed and considered. In particular, the model is related to a Poisson process in the plane, and for the parametric case simple algorithms are developed for parameter estimation. Regression models are also considered as well as various generalizations of the basic problem. Parallel to the theoretical development, data on patients diagnosed with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) are considered and a detailed analysis is given. The data report the dates of diagnosis with AIDS and infection with human immunodeficiency virus, for patients reported to the Centers of Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia, and thought to be infected by blood or blood-product transfusion. The analysis of these data was considered by Medley, Anderson, Cox, and Billard (1987), Lui et al. (1986), and others. It is shown that nonparametric analysis leads to simple estimates of certain parameters and indicates clearly the nature of an identifiability problem that arises with data of this kind. Problems arise in the estimation of the total number of infectives or percentiles of the distribution of the induction period, s.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478780

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Lawless, J. F.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1989-06
Volume
84
Issue
406
Pages
360-372
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2036335471
Cited by
317
References
12
FWCI
15.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inference Based on Retrospective Ascertainment: An Analysis of the Data on Transfusion-Related AIDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478780
The paper
Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Lawless, J. F. (1989). Inference Based on Retrospective Ascertainment: An Analysis of the Data on Transfusion-Related AIDS. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478780

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.