The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Monte Carlo Implementation of the EM Algorithm and the Poor Man's Data Augmentation Algorithms
Abstract
The first part of this article presents the Monte Carlo implementation of the E step of the EM algorithm. Given the current guess to the maximizer of the posterior distribution, latent data patterns are generated from the conditional predictive distribution. The expected value of the augmented log-posterior is then updated as a mixture of augmented log-posteriors, mixed over the generated latent data patterns (multiple imputations). In the M step of the algorithm, this mixture is maximized to obtain the update to the maximizer of the observed posterior. The gradient and Hessian of the observed log posterior are also expressed as mixtures, mixed over the multiple imputations. The relation between the Monte Carlo EM (MCEM) algorithm and the data augmentation algorithm is noted. Two modifications to the MCEM algorithm (the poor man's data augmentation algorithms), which allow for the calculation of the entire posterior, are then presented. These approximations serve as diagnostics for the validity of the normal approximation to the posterior, as well as starting points for the full data augmentation analysis. The methodology is illustrated with two examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Cited by
An introduction to MCMC for machine learning.
Andrieu, C., de Freitas, N., Doucet, A., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1020281327116 · Cited by 2,451
Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000235 · Cited by 1,834
The EM Algorithm—an Old Folk-song Sung to a Fast New Tune
Meng, X.-L., & Van Dyk, D. (1997) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00082 · Cited by 802
BLOG: Probabilistic Models with Unknown Objects
Milch, B., Marthi, B., Russell, S., Sontag, D., Ong, D. L., & Kolobov, A. (2007) · Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7432.003.0015 · Cited by 390
Standard Errors of Prediction in Generalized Linear Mixed Models
Booth, J. G., & Hobert, J. P. (1998) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1998.10474107 · Cited by 133
State-space likelihoods for nonlinear fisheries time-series
Valpine, P. D., & Hilborn, R. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f05-116 · Cited by 69
A stacked approach for chained equations multiple imputation incorporating the substantive model
Beesley, L. J., & Taylor, J. M. G. (2021) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13372 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Wei, G. C. G., & Tanner, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 411
- Pages
- 699-704
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2072634211
- Cited by
- 1,453
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.