The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Social Networks
Abstract
Interest in log-linear modeling for social-network data has grown steadily since Holland and Leinhardt (1981) proposed their p 1 model. That model was designed for a single binary relationship (directed graph) representing interactions between individuals. It assumed that interactions between pairs of individuals are mutually independent. Subsequent work has extended the model in various ways, including block-modeling and the case of dependence between pairs of individuals. In empirical work it would often be desirable to fit a wide variety of these models, as the differences in predictions or goodness of fit are likely to provide insights into the data. This has not been common practice, however, because estimation for some of the models has been difficult, and the maximum likelihood schemes developed for others involve different computer programs not always available in standard packages. The focus of this article is on a general estimation technique that maximizes the pseudolikelihood, the product of the probabilities of the binary variables, with each probability conditional on the rest of the data. The method is shown to be equivalent to a weighted least squares procedure and thus can be carried out with standard computer packages. In cases where true maximum likelihood estimation is available for comparison the two methods seem to work about equally well. The pseudolikelihood estimation is used in an example where the fits of a large number of different models are compared. Some of these models, such as various Markov block models, have not previously been proposed. In this example (as in others considered) it appears that the p 1-type models are overparameterized, and that much more parsimonious models give tolerable fits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis
Hoff, P. D., Raftery, A. E., & Handcock, M. S. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502388618906 · Cited by 1,917
Logit Models and Logistic Regressions for Social Networks: I. An Introduction to Markov Graphs and p
Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. (1996) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294547 · Cited by 950
Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks
Robins, G., Snijders, T., Wang, P., Handcock, M., & Pattison, P. (2007) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.003 · Cited by 832
A Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000005 · Cited by 819
Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models
Hunter, D. R., Goodreau, S. M., & Handcock, M. S. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214507000000446 · Cited by 689
Metadata
- Authors
- Strauss, D., & Ikeda, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 409
- Pages
- 204-212
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2069412834
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Social Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1990.10475327
- The paper
- Strauss, D., & Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Social Networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10475327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.