The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kernel Quantile Estimators
Abstract
For an estimator of quantiles, the efficiency of the sample quantile can be improved by considering linear combinations of order statistics, that is, L estimators. A variety of such methods have appeared in the literature; an important aspect of this article is that asymptotically several of these are shown to be kernel estimators with a Guassian kernel, and the bandwidths are identified. It is seen that some implicit choices of the smoothing parameter are asymptotically suboptimal. In addition, the theory of this article suggests a method for choosing the smoothing parameter. How much reliance should be placed on the theoretical results is investigated through a simulation study. Over a variety of distributions little consistent difference is found between various estimators. An important conclusion, made during the theoretical analysis, is that all of these estimators usually provide only modest improvement over the sample quantile. The results indicate that even if one knew the best estimator for each situation, one can expect an average improvement in efficiency of only 15%. Given the well-known distribution-free inference procedures (e.g., easily constructed confidence intervals) associated with the sample quantile, as well as the ease with which it can be calculated, it will often be a reasonable choice as a quantile estimator.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
Efron, B. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552 · Cited by 17,602
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
Nadaraya, E. A. (1964) · Theory of Probability & Its Applications · doi:10.1137/1109020 · Cited by 3,462
Watson, G. S. (1964) · PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) · Cited by 2,661
Kernel estimation of regression functions
Gasser, T., & Müller, H.-G. (1979) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0098489 · Cited by 814
Nonparametric Statistical Data Modeling
Parzen, E. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481621 · Cited by 713
Savage, I. R., & David, H. A. (1981) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287606 · Cited by 686
A new distribution-free quantile estimator
HARRELL, F. E., & DAVIS, C. E. (1982) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/69.3.635 · Cited by 546
A Probability Distribution and its Uses in Fitting Data
Ramberg, J. S., Dudewicz, E. J., Tadikamalla, P. R., & Mykytka, E. F. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1979.10489750 · Cited by 426
Smooth Optimum Kernel Estimators of Densities, Regression Curves and Modes
Müller, H. (1984) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346523 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheather, S. J., & Marron, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 410
- Pages
- 410-416
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2044458394
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kernel Quantile Estimators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1990.10476214
- The paper
- Sheather, S. J., & Marron, J. S. (1990). Kernel Quantile Estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10476214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.