The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Propagation of Probabilities, Means, and Variances in Mixed Graphical Association Models
Abstract
A scheme is presented for modeling and local computation of exact probabilities, means, and variances for mixed qualitative and quantitative variables. The models assume that the conditional distribution of the quantitative variables, given the qualitative, is multivariate Gaussian. The computational architecture is set up by forming a tree of belief universes, and the calculations are then performed by local message passing between universes. The asymmetry between the quantitative and qualitative variables sets some additional limitations for the specification and propagation structure. Approximate methods when these are not appropriately fulfilled are sketched. It has earlier been shown how to exploit the local structure in the specification of a discrete probability model for fast and efficient computation, thereby paving the way for exploiting probability-based models as parts of realistic systems for planning and decision support. The purpose of this article is to extend this computational scheme to networks, where some vertices represent entities that are measured on a quantitative and some on a qualitative scale. An extension has the advantage of unifying several known techniques, but allows more flexible and faithful modeling and speeds computation as well. To handle this more general case, the properties of (CG) conditional Gaussian distributions are exploited. A fictitious but simple example is used for illustration throughout the paper, concerned with monitoring emissions from a waste incinerator. From optical measurements of the darkness of the smoke, the concentration of CO2—which are both on a continuous scale—and possible knowledge about qualitative characteristics such as the type of waste burned, one wants to infer about the state of the incinerator and the current emission of heavy metals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bayesian Graphical Models for Discrete Data
Madigan, D., York, J., & Allard, D. (1995) · International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique · doi:10.2307/1403615 · Cited by 1,090
The EM algorithm for graphical association models with missing data
Lauritzen, S. L. (1995) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/0167-9473(93)e0056-a · Cited by 760
Self-citationBayesian networks in environmental modelling
Aguilera, P. A., Fernández, A., Fernández, R., Rumí, R., & Salmerón, A. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004 · Cited by 666
(2005) · Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) · doi:10.5555/1046920.1088695 · Cited by 650
Bayesian Networks for Data Mining
Heckerman, D. (1997) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009730122752 · Cited by 630
Metadata
- Authors
- Lauritzen, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 420
- Pages
- 1098-1108
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2046584898
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Propagation of Probabilities, Means, and Variances in Mixed Graphical Association Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1992.10476265
- The paper
- Lauritzen, S. L. (1992). Propagation of Probabilities, Means, and Variances in Mixed Graphical Association Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10476265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.