Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 910

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Annealing Markov Chain Monte Carlo with Applications to Ancestral Inference

Open access
Geyer, Charles J., Thompson, Elizabeth A.·1995·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC; the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm) has been used for many statistical problems, including Bayesian inference, likelihood inference, and tests of significance. Though the method generally works well, doubts about convergence often remain. Here we propose MCMC methods distantly related to simulated annealing. Our samplers mix rapidly enough to be usable for problems in which other methods would require eons of computing time. They simulate realizations from a sequence of distributions, allowing the distribution being simulated to vary randomly over time. If the sequence of distributions is well chosen, then the sampler will mix well and produce accurate answers for all the distributions. Even when there is only one distribution of interest, these annealing-like samplers may be the only known way to get a rapidly mixing sampler. These methods are essential for attacking very hard problems, which arise in areas such as statistical genetics. We illustrate the methods with an application that is much harder than any problem previously done by MCMC, involving ancestral inference on a very large genealogy (7 generations, 2,024 individuals). The problem is to find, conditional on data on living individuals, the probabilities of each individual having been a carrier of cystic fibrosis. Exact calculation of these conditional probabilities is infeasible. Moreover, a Gibbs sampler for the problem would not mix in a reasonable time, even on the fastest imaginable computers. Our annealing-like samplers have mixing times of a few hours. We also give examples of samplers for the “witch's hat” distribution and the conditional Strauss process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476590

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 910

Metadata

Authors
Geyer, C. J., & Thompson, E. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1995-09
Volume
90
Issue
431
Pages
909-920
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2043432627
Cited by
910
References
40
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annealing Markov Chain Monte Carlo with Applications to Ancestral Inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476590
The paper
Geyer, C. J., & Thompson, E. A. (1995). Annealing Markov Chain Monte Carlo with Applications to Ancestral Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476590

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.