The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage
Abstract
We attempt to recover a function of unknown smoothness from noisy sampled data. We introduce a procedure, SureShrink, that suppresses noise by thresholding the empirical wavelet coefficients. The thresholding is adaptive: A threshold level is assigned to each dyadic resolution level by the principle of minimizing the Stein unbiased estimate of risk (Sure) for threshold estimates. The computational effort of the overall procedure is order N · log(N) as a function of the sample size N. SureShrink is smoothness adaptive: If the unknown function contains jumps, then the reconstruction (essentially) does also; if the unknown function has a smooth piece, then the reconstruction is (essentially) as smooth as the mother wavelet will allow. The procedure is in a sense optimally smoothness adaptive: It is near minimax simultaneously over a whole interval of the Besov scale; the size of this interval depends on the choice of mother wavelet. We know from a previous paper by the authors that traditional smoothing methods—kernels, splines, and orthogonal series estimates—even with optimal choices of the smoothing parameter, would be unable to perform in a near-minimax way over many spaces in the Besov scale. Examples of SureShrink are given. The advantages of the method are particularly evident when the underlying function has jump discontinuities on a smooth background.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Cited by
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321
A New TwIST: Two-Step Iterative Shrinkage/Thresholding Algorithms for Image Restoration
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.909319 · Cited by 2,064
Wavelet-based statistical signal processing using hidden Markov models
Crouse, M. S., Nowak, R. D., & Baraniuk, R. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.668544 · Cited by 1,643
The Stationary Wavelet Transform and some Statistical Applications
Nason, G. P., & Silverman, B. W. (1995) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_17 · Cited by 1,122
Metadata
- Authors
- Donoho, D. L., & Johnstone, I. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 432
- Pages
- 1200-1224
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2079724595
- Cited by
- 4,630
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 53.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476626
- The paper
- Donoho, D. L., & Johnstone, I. M. (1995). Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476626
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.