The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Semiparametric Transformation Approach to Estimating Usual Daily Intake Distributions
Abstract
The distribution of usual intakes of dietary components is important to individuals formulating food policy and to persons designing nutrition education programs. The usual intake of a dietary component for a person is the long-run average of daily intakes of that component for that person. Because it is impossible to directly observe usual intake for an individual, it is necessary to develop an estimator of the distribution of usual intakes based on a sample of individuals with a small number of daily observations on a subsample of the individuals. Daily intake data for individuals are nonnegative and often very skewed. Also, there is large day-to-day variation relative to the individual-to-individual variation, and the within-individual variance is correlated with the individual means. We suggest a methodology for estimating usual intake distributions that allows for varying degrees of departure from normality and recognizes the measurement error associated with one-day dietary intakes. The estimation method contains four steps. First, the original data are standardized by adjusting for nuisance effects, such as day-of-week and interview sequence. Second, the daily intake data are transformed to normality using a combination of power and grafted polynomial transformations. Third, using a normal components-of-variance model, the distribution of usual intakes is constructed for the transformed data. Finally, a transformation of the normal usual intake distribution to the original scale is defined. The approach is applied to data from the 1985 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and works well for a set of dietary components that are consumed nearly daily and exhibit varying distributional shapes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes
Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1952) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729437 · Cited by 3,542
Cited by
National Estimates of Dietary Fructose Intake Increased from 1977 to 2004 in the United States
Marriott, B. P., Cole, N., & Lee, E. (2009) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.108.098277 · Cited by 473
Bailey, R. L. (2021) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2021.02.007 · Cited by 431
Allès, B., Baudry, J., Méjean, C., Touvier, M., Péneau, S., Hercberg, S., & Kesse-Guyot, E. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9091023 · Cited by 367
Clark, M. A., & Fox, M. K. (2009) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.060 · Cited by 189
Berner, L. A., Becker, G., Wise, M., & Doi, J. (2013) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2013.01.014 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Nusser, S. M., Carriquiry, A. L., Dodd, K. W., & Fuller, W. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 436
- Pages
- 1440-1449
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2571242704
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.