The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nearest-Neighbor Clutter Removal for Estimating Features in Spatial Point Processes
Abstract
We consider the problem of detecting features in spatial point processes in the presence of substantial clutter. One example is the detection of minefields using reconnaissance aircraft images that identify many objects that are not mines. Our solution uses Kth nearest neighbor distances of points in the process to classify them as clutter or otherwise. The observed Kth nearest neighbor distances are modeled as a mixture distribution, the parameters of which are estimated by a simple EM algorithm. This method allows for detection of generally shaped features that need not be path connected. In the minefield example this method yields high detection and low false-positive rates. Another application, to outlining seismic faults, is considered with some success. The method works well in high dimensions. The method can also be used to produce very high-breakdown-point–robust estimators of a covariance matrix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust Regression and Outlier Detection
Rousseeuw, P. J., & Leroy, A. M. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725382 · Cited by 5,609
Cited by
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability
Hennig, C. (2007) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.11.025 · Cited by 930
Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements
Fan, J., Liao, Y., & Mincheva, M. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12016 · Cited by 909
A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies
Hodge, V., & Austin, J. (2004) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-004-4304-y · Cited by 3,596
Thériault, S., Dina, C., Messika-Zeitoun, D., Le Scouarnec, S., Capoulade, R., Gaudreault, N., Rigade, S., Li, Z., Simonet, F., Lamontagne, M., et al. (2019) · Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine · doi:10.1161/circgen.119.002617 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Byers, S., & Raftery, A. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 442
- Pages
- 577-584
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2029436479
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nearest-Neighbor Clutter Removal for Estimating Features in Spatial Point Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1998.10473711
- The paper
- Byers, S., & Raftery, A. E. (1998). Nearest-Neighbor Clutter Removal for Estimating Features in Spatial Point Processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1998.10473711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.