The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semiparametric Regression for Repeated Outcomes with Nonignorable Nonresponse
Abstract
We consider inference about the parameter β* indexing the conditional mean of a vector of correlated outcomes given a vector of explanatory variables when some of the outcomes are missing in a subsample of the study and the probability of response depends on both observed and unobserved data values; that is, nonresponse is nonignorable. We propose a class of augmented inverse probability of response weighted estimators that are consistent and asymptotically normal (CAN) for estimating β* when the response probabilities can be parametrically modeled and a CAN estimator exists. The proposed estimators do not require full specification of a parametric likelihood, and their computation does not require numerical integration. Our estimators can be viewed as an extension of generalized estimating equation estimators that allows for nonignorable nonresponse. We show that our class essentially consists of all CAN estimators of β*. We also show that the asymptotic variance of the optimal estimator in our class attains the semiparametric variance bound for the model. When the model for nonresponse is richly parameterized, joint estimation of the regression parameter β* and the nonresponse model parameter τ* which encodes the magnitude of nonignorable selection bias, may be difficult or impossible. Therefore we propose regarding the selection bias parameter τ* as known, rather than estimating it from the data. We then perform a sensitivity analysis that examines how inference concerning the regression parameter β* changes as we vary τ* over a range of plausible values. We apply our approach to the analysis of ACTG Trial 002, an AIDS clinical trial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies
Little, R. J. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476615 · Cited by 1,522
Cited by
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models
Bang, H., & Robins, J. M. (2005) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x · Cited by 1,998
Self-citationHandling drop‐out in longitudinal studies
Hogan, J. W., Roy, J., & Korkontzelou, C. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1728 · Cited by 404
Ghisletta, P., & Spini, D. (2004) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986029004421 · Cited by 388
MMRM vs. LOCF: A Comprehensive Comparison Based on Simulation Study and 25 NDA Datasets
Siddiqui, O., Hung, H. M. J., & O'Neill, R. (2009) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543400802609797 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotnitzky, A., Robins, J. M., & Scharfstein, D. O.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 444
- Pages
- 1321-1339
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2097147565
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semiparametric Regression for Repeated Outcomes with Nonignorable Nonresponse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1998.10473795
- The paper
- Rotnitzky, A., Robins, J. M., & Scharfstein, D. O. (1998). Semiparametric Regression for Repeated Outcomes with Nonignorable Nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1998.10473795
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.