Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In-Vitro Analysis of Glucose and Quercetin Effects on m-TOR and Nrf-2 Expression in HepG2 Cell Line (Diabetes and Cancer Connection)

Yarahmadi, Amir, Khademi, Fatemeh, Mostafavi-Pour, Zohreh, Zal, Fatemeh·2018·Nutrition and Cancer

Abstract

Some types of cancers show a strong relationship with diabetes and play a central role in mortality in the patient population suffering from diabetes mellitus. In this study, HepG2 cells have been used to investigate the toxic effects of hyperglycemia and/or quercetin (Q) on mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) expression as central molecules involved in cancer. HepG2 cells were cultured with different concentrations of glucose (5.5, 30, and 50 mM) and/or Q (25 µM) for 48 and 72 h. Effects of glucose and/or Q on m-TOR and Nrf-2 expression were assayed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). qRT-PCR results revealed that 30 and 50 mM of glucose increased m-TOR expression at 48 h, although after 72 h, only 30 mM had an increasing effect. At 50 mM, glucose-induced Nrf-2 gene expression after both 48 and 72 h. The results also showed that 25 µM of Q reduced m-TOR and Nrf-2 expression at both 30 and 50 mM after 48 and 72 h incubation. Q has potential effects on reducing oxidative stress caused by hyperglycemia and during diabetes may be able to modulate some carcinogenic signaling pathways.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01635581.2018.1470654

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.05.066 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.10.020 · DOI
  3. Zal F, 2013, Diabetes Stoffwech H, 22, 283
  4. 10.1007/s40618-016-0592-8 · DOI
  5. 10.3109/15376516.2014.926437 · DOI
  6. 10.2337/diab.45.4.471 · DOI
  7. 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0064 · DOI
  8. Eggler AL, 2008, Mol Nutr Food Res, 52, S84
  9. 10.3892/ol.2017.5619 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.cbi.2011.12.005 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/acel.12015 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1074/jbc.M400549200 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90314-7 · DOI
  15. Pour ZM, 2015, Iran J Med Sci, 34, 271
  16. 10.5812/hepatmon.11447 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/15376516.2017.1344338 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/01635581.2017.1339813 · DOI
  19. Ryu JM, 2010, J Cell Physiol, 224, 59, 10.1002/jcp.22091 · DOI
  20. 10.3109/09637486.2014.940285 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.07.005 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.mce.2016.03.036 · DOI
  23. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0941 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602162 · DOI
  25. 10.1677/erc.0.0080249 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/cvr/cvr002 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.046 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.lfs.2014.06.005 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s00418-011-0869-0 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.06.006 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.phrs.2004.06.002 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.05.016 · DOI
  34. 10.1152/ajpheart.00402.2010 · DOI
  35. 10.1159/000366307 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.03.087 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.lfs.2011.09.023 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/hep.26616 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.12.008 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/ecam/neq053 · DOI

Cited by

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Yarahmadi, A., Khademi, F., Mostafavi-Pour, Z., & Zal, F.
Venue
Nutrition and Cancer
Published
2018-05-21
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
770-775
ISSN
  • 0163-5581
  • 1532-7914
Cited by
30
References
3
Language
en
Funders
Vice-chancellor for Research Affairs of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (95-11774)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.