Prevention of experimental oral cancer by extracts of Spirulina-Dunaliella algae
Abstract
An extract of Spirulina-Dunaliella algae was shown to prevent tumor development in hamster buccal pouch when a 0.1% solution of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) in mineral oil was applied topically three times weekly for 28 weeks. The algae extract was delivered by mouth in continued dosages of 140 micrograms in 0.4 ml mineral oil three times per week. After 28 weeks, the animals given vehicle and untreated controls all presented gross tumors of the right buccal pouch. Animals fed canthaxanthin presented a notably and statistically significant reduction in tumor number and size compared with controls. Animals fed beta-carotene demonstrated a smaller but statistically significant reduction in tumor number and size. The algae animals presented a complete absence of gross tumors. However, microscopic sections of the buccal pouch in the algae group showed localized areas of dysplasia and early carcinoma-in-situ undergoing destruction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microscopic sections of the buccal pouch of hamsters supplemented with Arthrospira platensis and Dunaliella algae extracts showed localized areas of dysplasia and early carcinoma undergoing destructions.
“Microscopic sections of the buccal pouch of hamsters supplemented with Arthrospira platensis and Dunaliella algae extracts showed localized areas of dysplasia and early carcinoma undergoing destructions [131].”
From Application of Arthrospira platensis for Medicinal Purposes and the Food Industry: A Review of the Literature (2023) · cites this paper as [131]
There was no evidence of toxicity in any of the animals receiving the algae extracts.
“There was no evidence of toxicity in any of the animals receiving the algae extracts [130,131].”
From Application of Arthrospira platensis for Medicinal Purposes and the Food Industry: A Review of the Literature (2023) · cites this paper as [131]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- Schwartz, J., Shklar, G., Reid, S., & Trickier, D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Schwartz, Joel
- Venue
- Nutrition and Cancer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-134
- ISSN
- 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7914
- OpenAlex
- W2043999200
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition and Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer and biochemical research
- Keywords
- oral cancer prevention, hamster buccal pouch, 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, chemical carcinogenesis, canthaxanthin, beta-carotene, dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, tumor suppression
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Carotenoids, Cheek, Cricetinae, Mouth Neoplasms, Plant Extracts, 9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene, Canthaxanthin, Eukaryota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review