Context Variation and Definitions in Learning the Meanings of Words: An Instance-Based Learning Approach
Abstract
This article proposes an instance-based theoretical framework to account for the influence of both contexts and definitions on learning new word meanings and reports 2 studies that examine hypotheses about learning from context. One is that variation in contexts is important for allowing core meaning features of a word to emerge. The second is that definitions are effective because they can interact with contexts to communicate core meanings. Both experiments tested the effects of context variation by presenting adult learners with context sentences that either varied or repeated with each training trial. Experiment 1 varied whether definitions were also provided, whereas Experiment 2 varied context variability without definitions and examined the role of reading comprehension skill and pre-training word familiarity. Results across several different measures were that exposure to variable contexts led to better learning of abstract meanings than did equivalent exposure to a single context. In addition, definitions were more effective at conveying this knowledge than context alone. The instance-based framework accounts for the dual effects of contexts and definitions, suggesting how word learning results from abstraction across varied word encounters, both definitions and context sentences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The role of memory in inferencing might be a passive resonance process rather than active construction.
“Also, the role of memory in inferencing might be a passive resonance process rather than active construction (Bolger, Balass, Landen, & Perfetti, 2008)”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Bolger, Balass, Landen, & Perfetti, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 203
- Authors
- Bolger, D. J., Balass, M., Landen, E., & Perfetti, C. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Discourse Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-03-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 122-159
- ISSN
- 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6950
- OpenAlex
- W1964413496
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Discourse Processes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- word learning, definitions, instance-based learning, core meaning, reading comprehension, word familiarity, vocabulary acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review