Cited by 203Second Language Acquisition and LearningReading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

Context Variation and Definitions in Learning the Meanings of Words: An Instance-Based Learning Approach

Bolger, Donald J., Balass, Michal, Landen, Eve, Perfetti, Charles A.·2008·Discourse Processes

Abstract

This article proposes an instance-based theoretical framework to account for the influence of both contexts and definitions on learning new word meanings and reports 2 studies that examine hypotheses about learning from context. One is that variation in contexts is important for allowing core meaning features of a word to emerge. The second is that definitions are effective because they can interact with contexts to communicate core meanings. Both experiments tested the effects of context variation by presenting adult learners with context sentences that either varied or repeated with each training trial. Experiment 1 varied whether definitions were also provided, whereas Experiment 2 varied context variability without definitions and examined the role of reading comprehension skill and pre-training word familiarity. Results across several different measures were that exposure to variable contexts led to better learning of abstract meanings than did equivalent exposure to a single context. In addition, definitions were more effective at conveying this knowledge than context alone. The instance-based framework accounts for the dual effects of contexts and definitions, suggesting how word learning results from abstraction across varied word encounters, both definitions and context sentences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01638530701792826

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The role of memory in inferencing might be a passive resonance process rather than active construction.

    “Also, the role of memory in inferencing might be a passive resonance process rather than active construction (Bolger, Balass, Landen, & Perfetti, 2008)”

    From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Bolger, Balass, Landen, & Perfetti, 2008

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 203

Authors
Bolger, D. J., Balass, M., Landen, E., & Perfetti, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Discourse Processes
Published
2008-03-04
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
122-159
ISSN
  • 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6950
OpenAlex
W1964413496
Cited by
203
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Discourse Processes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
word learning, definitions, instance-based learning, core meaning, reading comprehension, word familiarity, vocabulary acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review