The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adverbial stance types in English
Abstract
The present paper identifies various speech styles of English as marked by stance adver‐bials. By stance we mean the overt expression of an author's or speaker's attitudes, feelings, judgments, or commitment concerning the message. Adverbials are one of the primary lexical markers of stance in English, and we limit ourselves in this paper to adverbial marking of stance (the attitudinal and style disjuncts presented in Quirk, Green‐baum, Leech, & Svartvik, 1985). All occurrences of stance adverbials are identified in the LOB and London‐Lund corpora (410 texts of written and spoken British English), and each is analyzed in its sentential context to distinguish true markers of stance from adverbials that serve other functions (e.g., as manner adverbs). The adverbials marking stance are divided into six semantic categories, and the frequency of occurrence for each category in each text is computed. The six categories are labeled (1) honestly adverbials, (2) generally adverbials, (3) surely adverbials, (4) actually adverbials, (5) maybe adverbials, and (6) amazingly adverbials. Using a multivariate statistical technique called cluster analysis, texts that are maximally similar in their exploitation of these stance adverbials are grouped into clusters. We interpret each cluster by consideration of the frequent stance adverbials in the cluster, the situational characteristics of the texts in the cluster, and functional analyses of the stance adverbials in individual texts. Although the stance adverbials are grouped into categories on the basis of their literal meanings, the clusters are interpreted in terms of the discourse functions of the adverbials; in several cases, our analysis shows that the discourse functions of stance adverbials differ considerably from the functions suggested by their literal meanings. With respect to the adverbial marking of stance, eight styles are identified, including “Cautious,” “Secluded from Dispute,” and “Faceless.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language
Huddleston, R., Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1988) · Language · doi:10.2307/415437 · Cited by 7,587
A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language
Beauvais, P. J., Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357731 · Cited by 5,488
(1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,644
Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar
Freidin, R., & Jackendoff, R. S. (1975) · Language · doi:10.2307/413161 · Cited by 4,615
Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach
Kauffman, L. E., & Hymes, D. (1976) · Anthropological Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3316843 · Cited by 3,195
Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 2,726
Directions in sociolinguistics
John, J. G. (2017) · Cited by 1,649
Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology
Leavitt, J., Chafe, W., & Nichols, J. (1991) · Language · doi:10.2307/415546 · Cited by 1,612
Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy
Dillon, G. L., & Tannen, D. (1984) · Language · doi:10.2307/413655 · Cited by 1,306
Questions and politeness : strategies in social interaction
Goody, E. N. (1978) · Philosophy and Rhetoric · Cited by 1,297
Cited by
Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00049 · Cited by 3,301
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511486500 · Cited by 1,745
Sentiment Analysis: An Overview from Linguistics
Taboada, M. (2016) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040518 · Cited by 411
Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G. N., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021) · John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1075/z.232 · Cited by 394
Self-citation(2016) · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
- Venue
- Discourse Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6950
- OpenAlex
- W2010236170
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 27.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adverbial stance types in English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01638538809544689
- The paper
- Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.